1965
DOI: 10.2514/3.2893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic stability of thin-walled cylindrical and conical shells under axial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

1969
1969
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result justifies the generally accepted assumption that the paradoxical behavior of cylindrical shells in buckling is due to the high sensitivity of the buckling load to imperfections [1,13,15]. This phenomenon is commonly explained by the instability of equilibrium states in the vicinity of the buckling point on the bifurcation diagram [9,15,2]. However, the exact mechanisms of imperfection sensitivity are not fully understood, nor is there a reliable theory capable of predicting experimentally observed buckling loads [10,17,7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result justifies the generally accepted assumption that the paradoxical behavior of cylindrical shells in buckling is due to the high sensitivity of the buckling load to imperfections [1,13,15]. This phenomenon is commonly explained by the instability of equilibrium states in the vicinity of the buckling point on the bifurcation diagram [9,15,2]. However, the exact mechanisms of imperfection sensitivity are not fully understood, nor is there a reliable theory capable of predicting experimentally observed buckling loads [10,17,7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this paper, we apply our theory and obtain a mathematically rigorous proof of the classical formula for buckling load [11,14]. This result justifies the generally accepted assumption that the paradoxical behavior of cylindrical shells in buckling is due to the high sensitivity of the buckling load to imperfections [1,13,15]. This phenomenon is commonly explained by the instability of equilibrium states in the vicinity of the buckling point on the bifurcation diagram [9,15,2].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A variety of different explanations has been put forward, but with the experimental work of Tennyson [30] and the theoretical work of Almroth [1] it became clear that this discrepancy is mostly due to imperfections in loading conditions and in the shape of the specimens. Further experimental and theoretical work by many others has confirmed this conclusion [14,33,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…To overcome this issue, empirical knock down factors, which are the ratios of experimental buckling loads to theoretical buckling loads of the perfect shell structure, are applied to reduce the buckling load determined theoretically. Early empirical knock down factors established during the 1960s, such as the knock down factor suggested by Seide [3], which is recommended in the NASA SP-8007 Space vehicle design guideline [4] and Almroth [5] are meant to be applied to isotropic shell structures. When these knock-down factors are applied to composite shells, an equivalent shell wall thickness t eq is used to consider different imperfection sensitivities due to various laminate stacking sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical knock down factors according to [5], according to NASA SP-8007 [4], which is derived by Seide [3], and according to [7] are illustrated in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%