2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.79.062714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic scattering of electrons from dimethylsulfide and dimethylsulfoxide

Abstract: Differential cross sections for elastic scattering of electrons from dimethylsulfide and dimethylsulfoxide in the energy range from 30 to 500 eV are presented. The cross sections have been measured using a crossedbeam-type high-resolution electron spectrometer. The measured cross sections have been put on an absolute scale using the relative flow technique. The measured differential cross sections show an increase in the midangles at 30 and 50 eV for both the molecules that is characteristic of resonant enhanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
8
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DMS is the first and the most important molecule of the DMS family. The present Q el data is in excellent agreement with the measurements and theoretical calculations of Rao et al [9]. However, both experimental and theoretical values of Homem et al [10] have higher values than the present Q el curve at energies beyond 50 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…DMS is the first and the most important molecule of the DMS family. The present Q el data is in excellent agreement with the measurements and theoretical calculations of Rao et al [9]. However, both experimental and theoretical values of Homem et al [10] have higher values than the present Q el curve at energies beyond 50 eV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, Figure 7 shows the Q el plot for all the three members of the DMDS homologous series as no data is available in the literature. Figure 8 shows the Q el curve for DMSO target with the only available comparison of Rao et al [9]. The present cross sections are slightly lower than the theoretical data of Rao et al [9] however, in good agreement with their measured values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations