1998
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/31/22/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic scattering of electrons by polyatomic molecules in the energy range 300-1300 eV: CO, , , H and

Abstract: Differential cross sections (DCS) for the elastic scattering of electrons have been measured by the crossed-beam technique for CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , C 2 H 4 and C 2 H 6 in the angular range 30 • -120 • and at impact energies of 300, 500, 700, 900, 1100 and 1300 eV. The measurements were made with a view to test the validity of the independent atom model (IAM) for polyatomic molecules in this energy region. A comparison of experimental results with the IAM calculations indicates that the model is adequate for the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
22
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
9
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, the experimental data of [47] are normalized with those of [49] in Figure 1 at 90 • . Additionally included are the theoretical results predicted by the Schwinger variational iterative method (SVIM) of Iga et al [45] at 100, 200, 300, and 400 eV and the IAM approach of Maji et al [51] at 500, 700, and 900 eV. We found no experimental or any other theoretical results with which to compare our calculations for the energy domain of 1500 eV ≤ E i ≤ 10,000 eV.…”
Section: The Differential Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison, the experimental data of [47] are normalized with those of [49] in Figure 1 at 90 • . Additionally included are the theoretical results predicted by the Schwinger variational iterative method (SVIM) of Iga et al [45] at 100, 200, 300, and 400 eV and the IAM approach of Maji et al [51] at 500, 700, and 900 eV. We found no experimental or any other theoretical results with which to compare our calculations for the energy domain of 1500 eV ≤ E i ≤ 10,000 eV.…”
Section: The Differential Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The IAMS theory, on the other hand, produces only one minimum up to E i = 200 eV, and beyond that, the DCS shows smooth variation with the energy. In Figures 1-4, our DCS results for the electron projectiles are compared with the experimental data from Tanaka et al [46] that are available at E i = 60-100 eV, as well as those of Shyn et al [47] at E i = 40-90 eV, Register et al [48] at 50 eV, Kanik et al [49] at E i = 40-100 eV, Iga et al [45] at 100, 200, 300, and 400 eV, Bromberg [50] at 300, 400, and 500 eV, Maji et al [51] at 500, 700, and 900 eV, and Iga et al [52] at 500, 800, and 1000 eV. For comparison, the experimental data of [47] are normalized with those of [49] in Figure 1 at 90 • .…”
Section: The Differential Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Their electron beam was produced as secondary electrons from the moderator with the energy spread of several electronvolts. Maji et al [61] measured elastic DCSs for a number of carbon-containing molecules at the high-energy region from 300 to 1300 eV by the crossed-beam technique. They wanted to test the validity of the independent atom model for polyatomic molecules.…”
Section: Elastic Electron Scattering By Methane Molecule-modern Expermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements of DCS were carried out with an energy resolution of about 1 eV and by using the relative flow method at 30 • where the overall uncertainty was 15%. Basavaraju et al [62] gave tabulated values for measured DCSs in [61] and obtained a scaled DCSs regarded as a universal function of a scaled momentum transfer for a number molecular targets.…”
Section: Elastic Electron Scattering By Methane Molecule-modern Expermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work on elastic collisions between electrons and molecules include H 2 and N 2 (Isaacs & Morrison 1996), NO (Da Paixao et al 1996), C 0 2 (Gianturco k Stoecklin 1996), CO , C 0 2 (Takekawa k Itikawa 1996), 0 2 (Green et al 1997), H 2 0 (Gianturco et al 1998a), 0 3 ), C 0 2 (Tanaka et al 1998), CO, N 2 , NO, and 0 2 (Liu k Sun 1996), and CO, C0 2 , CH 4 , C 2 H 4 , and C 2 H 6 (Maji et al 1998). …”
Section: Electron Impact Of Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%