1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01546237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic scattering at larget

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

13
100
2
6

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
100
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly in the range 1.5 < −t < 2.0 GeV 2 the data presented a power law pattern proportional to ∼ |t| −8 , which is in poorly agreement with general model predictions. Interestingly enough, this specific power law behaviour was first envisaged by Donnachie and Landshoff [48] in a model which accounts for the contribution of three gluon exchange in elastic scattering at high energies. Yet, in the QCD context, the constituent interchange model by Lepage and Brodsky [49] predicts a different power law behaviour, namely ∼ |t| −10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Particularly in the range 1.5 < −t < 2.0 GeV 2 the data presented a power law pattern proportional to ∼ |t| −8 , which is in poorly agreement with general model predictions. Interestingly enough, this specific power law behaviour was first envisaged by Donnachie and Landshoff [48] in a model which accounts for the contribution of three gluon exchange in elastic scattering at high energies. Yet, in the QCD context, the constituent interchange model by Lepage and Brodsky [49] predicts a different power law behaviour, namely ∼ |t| −10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Also our dσ/dt is the same for pp and pp scattering, whereas experimentally these differ markedly in the dip region. This was nicely explained theoretically in [41] as an interference of single and double pomeron and three-gluon exchange. We will have to see if higher cumulant terms and/or a departure from the strict quark-diquark picture of the proton will lead us to an improvement on these points in our model.…”
Section: A ≤mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…7 we show our prediction for dσ/dt in pp scattering at √ s = 14 TeV corresponding to the LHC energy. The total cross section is again assumed to be given by the DL parameterisation (41). This was used as constraint to fix the extension parameter S p according to Fig.…”
Section: A ≤mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11]. However, if non-trivial interference effects in spin variables predicted in this work could be observed in experiment, it will not only be just a supplementary support for the f 1 trajectory but also a good test of the hard Pomeron contribution as well, because the hard Pomeron is important only in the J/ψ photoproductions.We should emphasize that the present investigation is the first step from the point of view of a dynamical treatment of the problem, as, for example, has been done for effective two-gluon model of Pomeron [18]. Here, we do not know the sign of g V f 1 γ vertex, and have predicted only the absolute value of beam-target asymmetry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We should emphasize that the present investigation is the first step from the point of view of a dynamical treatment of the problem, as, for example, has been done for effective two-gluon model of Pomeron [18]. Here, we do not know the sign of g V f 1 γ vertex, and have predicted only the absolute value of beam-target asymmetry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%