2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.153407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic properties of edges in BN and SiC nanoribbons and of boundaries in C-BN superlattices: A density functional theory study

Abstract: Using density functional theory calculations, we compute the edge energies and stresses for edges of SiC and BN nanoribbons, and the boundary energies and stresses for domain boundaries of graphene-BN superlattices. SiC and BN armchair nanoribbons show pronounced edge relaxations, which obliterate the threefold oscillatory behavior of the edge stress reported for graphene. Our calculations show small boundary stresses in graphene-BN superlattices, suggesting that such domain boundaries will not experience seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the average armchair edge stress of ABNNRs (ZBNNRs) is 0.26 (0.64) eV/Å in our calculations while this value is 0.55 (+0.32) eV/Å in Ref. [23], but the general conclusion remains the same, i.e., ABNNRs are under compressive stress while ZBNNRs are under tensile stress. The average edge energy of ABNNRs (ZBNNRs) is 0.76 (1.24) eV/Å in our calculations while this value is 0.93 (1.45) eV/Å in the work by Jun et al [23].…”
Section: Edge Stability Of Bn Nanoribbonsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the average armchair edge stress of ABNNRs (ZBNNRs) is 0.26 (0.64) eV/Å in our calculations while this value is 0.55 (+0.32) eV/Å in Ref. [23], but the general conclusion remains the same, i.e., ABNNRs are under compressive stress while ZBNNRs are under tensile stress. The average edge energy of ABNNRs (ZBNNRs) is 0.76 (1.24) eV/Å in our calculations while this value is 0.93 (1.45) eV/Å in the work by Jun et al [23].…”
Section: Edge Stability Of Bn Nanoribbonsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…[23], but the general conclusion remains the same, i.e., ABNNRs are under compressive stress while ZBNNRs are under tensile stress. The average edge energy of ABNNRs (ZBNNRs) is 0.76 (1.24) eV/Å in our calculations while this value is 0.93 (1.45) eV/Å in the work by Jun et al [23]. This edge energy difference is mainly due to the different choice of the DFT method [20,21].…”
Section: Edge Stability Of Bn Nanoribbonsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the recent advances in controllable growth of large-area, high-quality, twodimensional (2D) layered materials (e.g., graphene (Bae et al, 2010;Li et al, 2009;Reina et al, 2009;Sun et al, 2010) and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) (Lee et al, 2012;Song et al, 2010)) on metallic substrates, the field has naturally progressed toward the design and/or investigation of heterostructures based on out-of-plane (Liu et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2013;Xue et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2013) or in-plane Jun et al, 2011;Sutter et al, 2012) stacking of these nanomaterials. Layered heterostructures of graphene on boron nitride offer the best avenue of preserving the exotic properties of graphene and using them in nanoscale devices because of the near-perfect epitaxial lattice match, small van der Waals interactions between graphene and hBN, and most importantly because of the insulating nature of the underlying hBN layer(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%