ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of the type of root canal preparation, intraradicular post
and mechanical cycling on the fracture strength of roots.Material and Methodseighty human single rooted teeth were divided into 8 groups according to the
instruments used for root canal preparation (manual or rotary instruments), the
type of intraradicular post (fiber posts- FRC and cast post and core- CPC) and the
use of mechanical cycling (MC) as follows: Manual and FRC; Manual, FRC and MC;
Manual and CPC; Manual, CPC and MC; Rotary and FRC; Rotary, FRC and MC; Rotary and
CPC; Rotary, CPC and MC. The filling was performed by lateral compactation. All
root canals were prepared for a post with a 10 mm length, using the custom #2 bur
of the glass fiber post system. For mechanical cycling, the protocol was applied
as follows: an angle of incidence of 45°, 37°C, 88 N, 4 Hz, 2 million pulses. All
groups were submitted to fracture strength test in a 45° device with 1 mm/ min
cross-head speed until failure occurred.ResultsThe 3-way ANOVA showed that the root canal preparation strategy (p<0.03) and
post type (p<0.0001) affected the fracture strength results, while mechanical
cycling (p=0.29) did not.ConclusionThe root canal preparation strategy only influenced the root fracture strength
when restoring with a fiber post and mechanical cycling, so it does not seem to be
an important factor in this scenario.