2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic impedance based facies classification using support vector machine and deep learning

Abstract: Machine learning methods including support‐vector‐machine and deep learning are applied to facies classification problems using elastic impedances acquired from a Paleocene oil discovery in the UK Central North Sea. Both of the supervised learning approaches showed similar accuracy when predicting facies after the optimization of hyperparameters derived from well data. However, the results obtained by deep learning provided better correlation with available wells and more precise decision boundaries in cross‐p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(b)], but it could also be included in other machine learning packages. The proposed implementation uses the Flipout gradient estimator [31] to minimize the loss function in (5), in which a stochastic forward pass is applied by sampling the posterior distribution of neural parameters. The stochastic gradient descent method is used to update the neural parameters, and its performance depends on the variance of the gradient [27].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1(b)], but it could also be included in other machine learning packages. The proposed implementation uses the Flipout gradient estimator [31] to minimize the loss function in (5), in which a stochastic forward pass is applied by sampling the posterior distribution of neural parameters. The stochastic gradient descent method is used to update the neural parameters, and its performance depends on the variance of the gradient [27].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion methods for these categorical/discrete variables can then be adopted to solve this classification problem based on seismic data. Several solutions have been proposed, including statistical learning methods, such as the support vector machine [5], the K -nearest neighbor [6], the self-organizing maps [7], the random forest [8], the independent component analysis [9], and the generative topographic mapping [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current approaches for HPO in geophysics mainly rely on either similar past experiences, a trial and error approach (Aleardi et al., 2022) or a grid search of one or two dimensions (Nishitsuji & Exley, 2018; Moghadas, 2020) of this hyperparameter space. Even when one attempts to automate the grid search for optimal hyperparameters, a significant amount of manual intervention and interpretation is usually involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zang (2006) normalized the petrofabric type, rock mass structure, joint development degree and other rock mass quality information by introducing the BP neural network principle to qualitatively forecast the rock mass quality. Nishitsuji and Exley (2019) compared the performance of support vector machine, deep learning and linear classifier, Bayesian classifier and other models in the classification of lithofacies types. They believed the deep learning method is more likely to become the dominant method for lithology classification in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%