1975
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(75)90448-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic electron scattering in an intense field and two-photon emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This well-known infrared divergence was reported in other calcula tions in double Compton scattering [16,41,42] and should be canceled when self-energy corrections are included [28], It can be shown [40] that the one-step process can be written as a term originating from the interference between two-and one-step parts of the amplitude plus a term origi nating solely from the one-step part of the amplitude. Here, as in electron-seeded pair creation in a constant crossed field, the one-step probability is negative.…”
Section: B One-step Double Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This well-known infrared divergence was reported in other calcula tions in double Compton scattering [16,41,42] and should be canceled when self-energy corrections are included [28], It can be shown [40] that the one-step process can be written as a term originating from the interference between two-and one-step parts of the amplitude plus a term origi nating solely from the one-step part of the amplitude. Here, as in electron-seeded pair creation in a constant crossed field, the one-step probability is negative.…”
Section: B One-step Double Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These simulations iterate single vertex processes to approximate higher-order ones and our double-vertex calculation can assess the faithfulness of this approximation. In their calculation of the two-loop electron mass operator in a constant crossed field [28], Morozov and Ritus produced expressions for the total probability of polarized two-photon emission. However, their restriction to total probabilities, brevity of exposition, and emphasis on infrared behavior differ significantly from the intention of the present article to study the role of spin and virtual processes in more depth, which are currently neglected by computational simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumes that the formation region of the process is much smaller than the field inhomogeneity scale (typically, the wavelength), such that a good approximation is acquired by assuming the background to be "locally constant" [35,36] by using rates for a constant crossed field (CCF). However, a crucial issue to be addressed when going beyond single-vertex processes is the nature of interference between those channels where intermediate states remain on shell and those where they remain virtual, as occurs in electron-seeded pair creation [5,6,37] and double nonlinear Compton scattering [38][39][40][41]. (Reviews of laser-based strong-field QED can be found in Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b)]. The amplitude (1) [23]. At such a resonance, where the matrix element formally diverges, S may be rendered finite by including a small, imaginary correction to the laser-dressed electron mass and energy [28,29], or alternatively be regularized with an external parameter such as the laser pulse length or a finite detector resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%