2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00033-018-1068-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic contact of a stiff thin layer and a half-space

Abstract: The 3D problem in linear elasticity for a layer lying on a half-space is subject to a two-parametric asymptotic treatment using the small parameters corresponding to the relative thickness of the layer and stiffness of the foundation. General scaling for the displacements and stresses is inspired by the analysis of the exact solution of the toy plane strain problem for a vertical sinusoidal load. The direct asymptotic procedure widely used in mechanics of thin structures is adapted for the layer. It is demonst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, bending deformation may occur only for a relatively soft foundation. Otherwise, the beam itself behaves as an elastic foundation according to the Winkler assumption, see, e.g., the results of the multiparametric analysis in [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, bending deformation may occur only for a relatively soft foundation. Otherwise, the beam itself behaves as an elastic foundation according to the Winkler assumption, see, e.g., the results of the multiparametric analysis in [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is then tempting to model the response of the layer using the Timoshenko beam theory but still model the response of the half-space using the Winkler assumption. This possibility has indeed been analysed by Erbas et al (2022) for the dynamic case without prestress; see also Kaplunov et al (2019). Adapting equation ( 17) in Goldenveizer et al (1993) to our static case, we obtain…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It is then tempting to model the response of the layer using the Timoshenko beam theory but still model the response of the half-space using the Winkler assumption. This possibility has indeed been analysed by Erbas et al [38] for the dynamic case without prestress (see also [39]). Adapting equation (17) in Goldenveizer et al [40] to our static case, we obtain…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%