1998
DOI: 10.1071/mf97122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elasmobranch exploitation in Africa

Abstract: The impact of fisheries on elasmobranchs in Africa is not well documented. Available data suggest that there are no large shark fishing nations (> 10000 t year-1), reported landings for 1994 being around 39 000 t. This value is believed to be a underestimate, because of a lack of data on catches and landings from the various different fishing methods and the large number of nations fishing in African waters. Existing data are mostly linked to industrial fisheries, although the artisanal sector could be resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Springer and Lowe (1963) reported similar findings, with a catch of a neonate (21.3 cm TL) smaller than the largest recorded embryo (24 cm TL). This observation of neonate catches is also reported in shark fisheries from Africa and the Mediterranean Sea (Kroese andSauer 1998, Saidi et al 2008).…”
Section: Canis M Norrisi (Cervigón and Alcalá 1999) M Antarcticusmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Springer and Lowe (1963) reported similar findings, with a catch of a neonate (21.3 cm TL) smaller than the largest recorded embryo (24 cm TL). This observation of neonate catches is also reported in shark fisheries from Africa and the Mediterranean Sea (Kroese andSauer 1998, Saidi et al 2008).…”
Section: Canis M Norrisi (Cervigón and Alcalá 1999) M Antarcticusmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This figure greatly exceeds the estimated mean annual catch of 500 kg of elasmobranches per km of coastline in Madagascar stated by Kroese and Sauer (1998) in their review of African elasmobranch fisheries, a worrying underestimate when you consider that there are at least 14 other similar villages that exploit sharks within 100 km of the study area (den Haring, pers. commun.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Globally, sharks and other apex predatory fish species are in decline (Baum et al 2003;Christensen et al 2003;Baum and Myers 2004), largely as a result of life history characteristics that make them vulnerable to fisheries exploitation (i.e., slow growth, late maturity and low fecundity; Walker 1998; Kroese and Sauer 1998;Stevens et al 2000). However, some shark species are also facing threats from habitat alteration associated with coastal development (Manire and Gruber 1990;Camhi et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%