2009
DOI: 10.1177/0093650208326462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration of the Hostile Media Phenomenon

Abstract: Hostile media perception (HMP) is a phenomenon showing the significance of individual factors in evaluation of media content. Extending theoretical understanding of HMP, this study has two purposes: (a) to examine the roles of different types of involvement in hostile media effect (HME), that is, value-relevant and outcome-relevant involvement, and (b) to explore relationships between HMP and other media-related perceptions, such as congruency of perceived media influence, media skepticism, and perceived opini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, without content analytic evidence that the news media in question are actually biased, one cannot know whether respondents' perceptions hew closer to distortion or accuracy. In addition, when respondents are asked if they perceive bias in the news media, we do not know if they are calling up a prototype of "the media" or generalized skepticism about media (Choi et al, 2009), or whether different groups of partisans even have the same news content in mind, a particular problem today in light of increasing ideological selectivity (Goldman & Mutz, 2011). And despite methodologically sophisticated data analytic techniques, the prosaic, but inevitable, problem of inferring causation from correlation remains.…”
Section: Methodological Research-based Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, without content analytic evidence that the news media in question are actually biased, one cannot know whether respondents' perceptions hew closer to distortion or accuracy. In addition, when respondents are asked if they perceive bias in the news media, we do not know if they are calling up a prototype of "the media" or generalized skepticism about media (Choi et al, 2009), or whether different groups of partisans even have the same news content in mind, a particular problem today in light of increasing ideological selectivity (Goldman & Mutz, 2011). And despite methodologically sophisticated data analytic techniques, the prosaic, but inevitable, problem of inferring causation from correlation remains.…”
Section: Methodological Research-based Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has found that certain types of involvement -value-relevant involvement, along with affective involvement (e.g., emotional reactions about an issue) -influence hostile media perceptions (Choi, Yang, & Chang, 2009;Matthes, 2013).…”
Section: Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "Persuasive Press Inference" (Gunther, 1998) argues that exposure to mass media, opinionated news in particular, affects perceptions of public opinion (Gunther & Christen, 2002;Hwang, Pan, & Sun, 2008;Mutz & Soss, 1997), via a presumed media influence on others (Choi, Yang, & Chang, 2009;Gunther & Christen, 2002). Perceptions of the opinion climate are affected by expectations of presumed media influence, because people extrapolate the small sample of news they see to news more generally and assume that such news reaches many of their fellow citizens (Gunther, Christen, Liebhart, & Chia, 2001;Shen & Huggins, 2013).…”
Section: Opinionated News and The Consequences Of Presumed Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study employed a reduced five-item version of the outcome involvement scale by Cho and Boster [18] as used in Choi, Yang, and Chang [24]. The questions were adapted to the topic of breast cancer and the environment (e.g., "All in all, the ways that the environment impacts my risk for breast cancer is important in my life").…”
Section: Rq3 How Does Scientific Literacy Influence Attitude Toward mentioning
confidence: 99%