2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration of oxide dispersion strengthened Fe-14Cr stainless steel by selective laser melting

Abstract: et al.. Elaboration of oxide dispersion strengthened Fe-14Cr stainless steel by selective laser melting. Abstract: This study presents the influence of the main selective laser melting (SLM) processing parameters on the densification behavior and microstructure evolution of oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) Fe-14Cr stainless steel. Optimization of the process parameters allows to manufacture ODS stainless steel parts, which present high densities up to 98% and a fine dispersion of nanosized Y-Ti rich oxide p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18] Vasquez et al achieved 98% of density and the fine dispersion of nanosized Y-Ti-O particles by using a powder mixture (steel, Y2O3 and TiH2 ) prepared by ball milling for extended duration of 176 hours. [19] Boegelein et al fabricated ferritic ODS-PM2000 samples by SLM from a pre-alloyed powder, in which non-randomly occurred voids, up to 150 µm in size, and inclusions up to 50 µm in size were observed. Smaller pores (≤ 20 µm in size) and finely distributed nanoinclusions with a mean size of 17 nm formed inside the thin walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] Vasquez et al achieved 98% of density and the fine dispersion of nanosized Y-Ti-O particles by using a powder mixture (steel, Y2O3 and TiH2 ) prepared by ball milling for extended duration of 176 hours. [19] Boegelein et al fabricated ferritic ODS-PM2000 samples by SLM from a pre-alloyed powder, in which non-randomly occurred voids, up to 150 µm in size, and inclusions up to 50 µm in size were observed. Smaller pores (≤ 20 µm in size) and finely distributed nanoinclusions with a mean size of 17 nm formed inside the thin walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) AM have utilized ferritic or austenitic steels mechanically alloyed with Y 2 O 3 as AM feedstock. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Alternatively, low-energy ball milling and blending, [21][22][23] along with methods to deposit oxides onto powders in situ, have been reported as alternative feedstock techniques for fabrication by AM. [24][25][26][27][28] While some promising results have been reported, challenges related to heterogeneity and agglomeration of pre-existing Y 2 O 3 remain, and these approaches typically depend on MA processing, which can be a limiting factor to scalability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of the present study was first to develop LPBF AM process maps for predicting build results ranging from porous structures to unstable/ swelled structures for 14YWT GARS precursor powders to identify parameters that yield high density and process stability/repeatability. In the reported literature on the LPBF of ODS steels, only a few discuss the processing parameters used 20,39,43 and, of those, it is not universally clear whether the reported oxide sizes and densities can be associated with a stable processing space. The second objective was to identify the distribution of elements and phases within the GARS powder and lastly to downselect to the stable samples with the highest density and to characterize the microstructure, material properties, and distribution of nano-scale oxides in the LPBF produced ODS steel matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies on this topic show that it is difficult to achieve the optimum nanoparticle size according to the Orowan mechanism due to segregation or agglomeration of the nanoparticles, which in turn was found to deteriorate the mechanical properties of the part [13]. Approaches to optimize the process such as evaluating the influence of the powder characteristics [14] and process parameters [15], or alternative additivation routes such as light mixing [16], improve the dispersion of the nanoparticles; however, they still lack control over the nanoparticle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%