2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration of controlled size Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 crystallites from glass-ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of pellet thickness during the heat treatment is also illustrated in Figure 3 (note that here positive displacement corresponds to reduction in thickness). The measured volume change coincides with LAGP crystallization peak reported previously by differential scanning calorimetry (Kubanska et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2015). The crystallization process resulted in highly porous bodies of agglomerated crystalline powder that were subsequently reground by hand in a mortar.…”
Section: Materials Synthesis and Crystallizationsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evolution of pellet thickness during the heat treatment is also illustrated in Figure 3 (note that here positive displacement corresponds to reduction in thickness). The measured volume change coincides with LAGP crystallization peak reported previously by differential scanning calorimetry (Kubanska et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2015). The crystallization process resulted in highly porous bodies of agglomerated crystalline powder that were subsequently reground by hand in a mortar.…”
Section: Materials Synthesis and Crystallizationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Resistively heating the sample itself, a process limited to electronically conductive materials is even more effective than traditional SPS but requires an SPS furnace with additional complexity of the die structure . SPS sintering of LAGP has been reported, but the achieved density was only 87% of theoretical, and the 20°C conductivity was measured to be 3.3 × 10 −5 S cm −1 (Kubanska et al, 2014), a much lower value than what is commonly reported for such a density (Mariappan et al, 2011). It is notable that an additional, though low intensity, peak appears in the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the sample after SPS, corresponding to the most intense peak of AlPO4, an insulating secondary phase, though a causal connection was not asserted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, it was not possible to perform the ECM analysis at the higher temperatures on the impedance plots since the semicircles representing the grains and grain boundary curves were stopped at 40 °C and no longer shown. Higher than this temperature, the grains contribution will shift to higher frequencies and it will be hardly observed and separated from the grain boundaries contribution in the used available measured frequencies range [15]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total resistance of the sample is consisting of the grains and grain boundaries resistances. The high frequency semi-circle can be attributed to the LAGP grains conductivity while the low frequency to the grain boundaries contribution [15,57]. From Table 4, it is clear that both the grains and the grain-boundary ionic conductivities values of the MW optimized sample are significantly higher than their corresponding values of the conventionally optimized sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation