2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2010.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration and characterisation of a plasticized cellulose triacetate membrane containing trioctylphosphine oxyde (TOPO): Application to the transport of uranium and molybdenum ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transport studies through cellulose triacetate membranes as polymeric matrix with showing high flux and good stability have been recently reported [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport studies through cellulose triacetate membranes as polymeric matrix with showing high flux and good stability have been recently reported [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a cross section of this membrane shows a more complicated, stratified structure. This structure is different in comparison with article (11,45,47) where the presented structure was strongly porous. In case of the membrane containing ONPOE as plasticizer and 1-alkylimidazoles as carrier (Figs.…”
Section: Semmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…van der Waals and hydrogen bonds [44]. Consequently, the analysis and comparison of the obtained spectrums revealed that all the membrane constituents remained as pure components inside the membrane [44,58].…”
Section: Afm and Ftir Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The surface morphology of both membranes has light and dark regions. These regions may have occurred because of either different speed of the solvent vaporization [13,18] or membranes having a porous structure where the pores of membrane have been filled by NPOE or NPOE + FFAT [57,58]. The comparison between the two AFM pictures showed the differences between the surfaces of membranes result from the existence of carrier in PIM.…”
Section: Afm and Ftir Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%