1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005983932240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors also showed that in the investigated deciduous species the dominating leaf sink for Hg was tissues of the leaf interior (>90%) with minor amounts on the surface and in the cuticle. Browne and Fang (1978), using a whole-plant chamber and 203 Hg-labelled mercury, found strong evidence that all Hg vapour uptake in wheat was confined to the leaves (basically nothing in stems and roots) and that the uptake was, like stomatal conductance, dependent on illumination but unaffected by temperature. As already mentioned, in our wheat experiment charcoal filtration of the air during the grain filling period essentially prevented net uptake of Hg by the leaves, pointing towards uptake from the atmosphere being the dominating Hg source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These authors also showed that in the investigated deciduous species the dominating leaf sink for Hg was tissues of the leaf interior (>90%) with minor amounts on the surface and in the cuticle. Browne and Fang (1978), using a whole-plant chamber and 203 Hg-labelled mercury, found strong evidence that all Hg vapour uptake in wheat was confined to the leaves (basically nothing in stems and roots) and that the uptake was, like stomatal conductance, dependent on illumination but unaffected by temperature. As already mentioned, in our wheat experiment charcoal filtration of the air during the grain filling period essentially prevented net uptake of Hg by the leaves, pointing towards uptake from the atmosphere being the dominating Hg source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deposition of Hg, representing the downward flux, is a combination of Hg 0 (dry deposition) and oxidized species of Hg, including particulate Hg (dry and wet deposition). The re-emission of Hg from terrestrial and water surfaces, the upward flux, consist primarily of gaseous Hg 0 (Bishop et al, 2020). Wet deposition of Hg is widely monitored by measuring Hg in precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beside animals, that can accumulate Hg, also trees can take up Hg from their environment. Mercury enters in the tree foliage primarily through the stomatal openings during respiration as Hg°, but can also accumulate on leaves as wet or dry deposition from the atmosphere [48][49][50], or enter in the tree tissues through the uptake of dissolved Hg from soil through the vascular system [51]. Gaseous Hg° is readily taken up by stomata, but due to its volatile nature it may be released back into the atmosphere [52][53][54].…”
Section: Mercury Atmospheric Cycle and Uptake In Plants And Barksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants can generally absorb the ionic state and dissolve gaseous mercury in soil through root [16], meanwhile they can absorb the gaseous elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) in the atmosphere through the stomatal respiration of leaves [17]. Generally speaking, mercury concentration in plant leaves is much higher than that in roots [18]. Foliar dust can absorb the bivalent active gaseous mercury and particulate mercury in the atmosphere, becoming an important medium for mercury enrichment [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%