Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hg−Hg#1 distance is 2.5358(8) Å and is much shorter than Hg−Hg distance of 3.00 Å in solid mercury and also shorter than the sum of the covalent radii, 2.88 Å. This distance is shorter than the Hg−Hg distance of 2.7362(6), 2.6881(4), and 2.5469(8) Å reported in [Pt 2 Hg 2 (P 2 phen) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 , [Pd 2 Hg 2 (P 2 phen) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 , and [Hg 2 (TLA) 2 ](CLO 4 ) 2 (TLA is abbreviation for tris[(2-(6-methylpyridyl))methyl]amine) complexes, respectively; , however, it is comparable to the Hg−Hg distance in Hg 2 Cl 2 , 2.53 Å . The Hg−Hg bond distance is near the higher end of the 2.49−2.56 Å range reported for the mercurous ion complexes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Hg−Hg#1 distance is 2.5358(8) Å and is much shorter than Hg−Hg distance of 3.00 Å in solid mercury and also shorter than the sum of the covalent radii, 2.88 Å. This distance is shorter than the Hg−Hg distance of 2.7362(6), 2.6881(4), and 2.5469(8) Å reported in [Pt 2 Hg 2 (P 2 phen) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 , [Pd 2 Hg 2 (P 2 phen) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 , and [Hg 2 (TLA) 2 ](CLO 4 ) 2 (TLA is abbreviation for tris[(2-(6-methylpyridyl))methyl]amine) complexes, respectively; , however, it is comparable to the Hg−Hg distance in Hg 2 Cl 2 , 2.53 Å . The Hg−Hg bond distance is near the higher end of the 2.49−2.56 Å range reported for the mercurous ion complexes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Complex 5 is the first example of a structurally characterized mercurous cation complex of a monocycle where Hg 2 2+ is trapped inside the cavity of the monocycle. Catalano et al have explained why the formation of mercurous ion may be due to presence of HgO impurity with Hg(0) and the reaction of Hg(II) and Hg(0) strongly favors Hg 2 2+ . , Recently, Baldwin et al have reported the formation of mercurous dimer from the mercuric salt . They have also explained it as the disproportion of Hg(II) and Hg(0) to give Hg 2 2+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Baldwin group reported a Hg­(I) complex of a tripodal nitrogen ligand isolated from the reaction with a Hg­(II) salt via comproportionation of Hg­(II) and Hg(0) to give Hg 2 2+ . In a range of studies, however, the serendipitous formation of Hg 2 2+ complexes from Hg­(II) has been attributed to the role of the solvent or ligand as the possible reducing agent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep blue colour results from intraligand transitions, a similar colour being observed for the Cd analogue. In another study producing a bimetallic complex, Bebout et al 52 encapsulated a dimeric mercurous [Hg 2 ] 21 ion within a pair of tetradentate tripodal nitrogen ligands, tris[(2-(6-methylpyridyl)) methyl]amine. In this instance the Hg … Hg bond distance is very short at ca.…”
Section: Mercurymentioning
confidence: 99%