El cuidado anestésico en Oftalmología

Benatar-Haserfaty, J.; Tercero-López, J.

doi:10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.009

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We found a further 17 studies using the ISAS to assess satisfaction. Eight of these used the ISAS for satisfaction with ophthalmology procedures; [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] only one of these studies 28 performed further validation of the scale within their patient cohorts. The remaining studies used the ISAS to assess satisfaction with Monitored Anesthetic Care for other procedures and surgery.…”

Section: Monitored Anesthetic Care (Table 4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-Satisfaction Measures in Anesthesia

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient satisfaction is an important measure of the quality of health care and is used as an outcome measure in interventional and quality improvement studies. Previous studies have found that there are few appropriately developed and validated questionnaires available. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify all tools used to measure patient satisfaction with anesthesia, which have undergone a psychometric development and validation process, appraised the quality of these processes, and made recommendations of tools that may be suitable for use in different clinical and academic settings. There are a number of robustly developed and subsequently validated instruments, however, there are still many studies using nonvalidated instruments or poorly developed tools, claiming to accurately assess satisfaction with anesthesia. This can lead to biased and inaccurate results. Researchers in this field should be encouraged to use available validated tools, to ensure that patient satisfaction is measured and reported fairly and accurately.

show abstract