2017
DOI: 10.22187/rfd201716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

El consenso de los partidos Colorado y Nacional en la política exterior uruguaya (1985-2005)

Abstract: Resumen: Este trabajo se enmarca dentro del Análisis de Política Exterior, como área de investigación donde convergen las Relaciones Internacionales y la Ciencia Política. El argumento central que aquí se desarrolla sostiene que la política exterior inaugurada en la redemocratización no fue una política de Estado, sino una política de consenso entre los partidos fundacionales (Colorado y NacionalEl consenso de los partidos Colorado y Nacional en la política exterior uruguaya 133 Revista de la Facultad de Dere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main innovations from this study is to compare all the four parliaments (in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay) with a common framework to understand how national legislatures operate with the enlargement of this regional bloc. While there are other important works about individual cases (Burian, 2017;Mesquita, 2012;Ribeiro et al, 2021;Sanchez, 2015), there is a gap in the literature to find commonalities regarding the legislative behaviour about Mercosur. This article analyses nine cases from 2006 to 2021: covering the four founding members of Mercosur, each of them incorporated two Protocols of Accession (the exception is Uruguay, which approved three, because of a dispute about the Bolivian protocols). It applies Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to understand which conditions were present in the approval of these agreements that allowed the enlargement of the bloc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main innovations from this study is to compare all the four parliaments (in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay) with a common framework to understand how national legislatures operate with the enlargement of this regional bloc. While there are other important works about individual cases (Burian, 2017;Mesquita, 2012;Ribeiro et al, 2021;Sanchez, 2015), there is a gap in the literature to find commonalities regarding the legislative behaviour about Mercosur. This article analyses nine cases from 2006 to 2021: covering the four founding members of Mercosur, each of them incorporated two Protocols of Accession (the exception is Uruguay, which approved three, because of a dispute about the Bolivian protocols). It applies Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to understand which conditions were present in the approval of these agreements that allowed the enlargement of the bloc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main innovations from this study is to compare all the four parliaments (in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay) with a common framework to understand how national legislatures operate with the enlargement of this regional bloc. While there are other important works about individual cases (Burian, 2017; Mesquita, 2012; Ribeiro et al, 2021; Sanchez, 2015), there is a gap in the literature to find commonalities regarding the legislative behaviour about Mercosur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%