2013
DOI: 10.26754/uz.978-84-15770-61-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

El campamento mesolítico del Cabezo de la Cruz : La Muela : Zaragoza

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, it has been suggested that sites such as Sota Palou (CRPES 1985), Cabezo de la Cruz (Rodanés and Picazo 2013) and Parque Darwin (Escobar 2010) would represent a single short-term seasonal occupation associated with the documentation of a hut floor. Nevertheless, the reduced size of the excavated surfaces (40 m 2 , 12 m 2 and 77 m 2 , respectively) and the limited spatial and chronological information available call for cautious interpretation, at least for now.…”
Section: Early Holocene Open-air Palimpsest Research In the Iberian P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, it has been suggested that sites such as Sota Palou (CRPES 1985), Cabezo de la Cruz (Rodanés and Picazo 2013) and Parque Darwin (Escobar 2010) would represent a single short-term seasonal occupation associated with the documentation of a hut floor. Nevertheless, the reduced size of the excavated surfaces (40 m 2 , 12 m 2 and 77 m 2 , respectively) and the limited spatial and chronological information available call for cautious interpretation, at least for now.…”
Section: Early Holocene Open-air Palimpsest Research In the Iberian P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of Mesolithic combustion features has been recorded over the past two decades in this areaexemplified by Cabezo de la Cruz (Rodanés and Picazo 2013), Font del Ros (Martinez-Moreno and Mora 2011), Parque Darwin (Escobar 2010), Benàmer (Torregrosa Giménez et al 2011) and Casa Corona (Fernández-López de Pablo et al 2013. However, the recognition of fire traces has not been accompanied by specific contextual geoarchaeological studies, and the conclusions about the presumed function of these features have largely relied on archaeobotanical data (Badal 2013;Roda-Gilabert et al 2013;Berihuete Azorín, et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%