2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1708-8_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EKRV: Ensemble of kNN and Random Committee Using Voting for Efficient Classification of Phishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be noticed from Fig. 4 that ERCRFS used by us perform better compared to EKRV [2] and HEFS [5]. Unfortunately, none of the Ensemble schemes behave uniformly on all the data sets.…”
Section: Investigation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be noticed from Fig. 4 that ERCRFS used by us perform better compared to EKRV [2] and HEFS [5]. Unfortunately, none of the Ensemble schemes behave uniformly on all the data sets.…”
Section: Investigation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The top classifiers are then combined using various ensemble approaches such as StackingC, Stacking, Grading and Voting. The experimental results obtained on the data sets indicate that ERCRFS outperforms the existing Models [2] in terms of Prediction Accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Ensemble of KNN and Random committee using voting (EKRV) is proposed by Niranjan et al (2019) [41] to detect the phishing sites. The proposed work consists of two phases such as pre-processing and classification.…”
Section: A Ensemble Models To Detect Phishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of this system is detecting some minimal false-positive and false-negative results. Authors in Niranjan et al [48] used the UCI dataset on phishing containing 6157 legitimate and 4898 phishing instances out of a total of 11,055 instances. The EKRV model was used that involves a combination of KNN and random committee techniques.…”
Section: Hybrid Learning (Hl) Based Phishing Attack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in Niranjan et al [48] proposed an ensemble technique through the voting and stacking method. They selected the UCI ML phishing dataset and take only 23 features out of 30 features for further attack detection.…”
Section: Hybrid Learning (Hl) Based Phishing Attack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%