2022
DOI: 10.29023/alanyaakademik.1071556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ekonomik Özgürlük ve Borçlanma Faiz Oranları Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi

Abstract: Ekonomik özgürlükler ülkelerin toplum refahını gösteren, kurumsal yapıyı ortaya koyan gerek tüzel kişilerin gerekse bireylerin kendi emek ve mülkiyetini kontrol edebilme, üretim, tüketim ve yatırım kararlarını alabilme anlamında uluslar açısından önemli kavramlardan biridir. Artan özgürlüklerin getireceği refah yaşam ile birlikte ülkelerin borçlanma seviyelerinde azalma olması beklenmektedir. Ekonomik özgürlükler, Heritage Vakfı’nın hazırladığı ekonomik özgürlük endeksi ile temsil edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda bu ç… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of method content, it was used for both models because the dependent variables do not have lagged values; it solves the endogeneity problem, it captures country-specific, unobserved heterogeneities, the variables can show dynamic effects depending on the period, the country crosssection (n) is higher than the time cross-section (t), and it does not take into account the stationarity and cross-section dependence of the series. Because if fixed/random effects methods were used instead of dynamic panel analysis, the results would be inconsistent since the dependent variables are associated with the error term (Coşkun & Kök, 2011;Béjaoui & Bouzgarrou, 2014;Büyükoğlu et al, 2022). Thus, the GMM model initiated by Blundell and Bond (1998) is much more effective than similar panel data models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of method content, it was used for both models because the dependent variables do not have lagged values; it solves the endogeneity problem, it captures country-specific, unobserved heterogeneities, the variables can show dynamic effects depending on the period, the country crosssection (n) is higher than the time cross-section (t), and it does not take into account the stationarity and cross-section dependence of the series. Because if fixed/random effects methods were used instead of dynamic panel analysis, the results would be inconsistent since the dependent variables are associated with the error term (Coşkun & Kök, 2011;Béjaoui & Bouzgarrou, 2014;Büyükoğlu et al, 2022). Thus, the GMM model initiated by Blundell and Bond (1998) is much more effective than similar panel data models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%