2019
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Either or? Reconciling Findings on Mental Health and Extremism using a Dimensional Rather than Categorical Paradigm

Abstract: The background for this paper is the debate over what role mental illness plays in radicalization to violent extremism. While one camp points to cases of abnormal functioning of perpetrators, another argues that normal psychological mechanisms are central. Through a review of these perspectives, it becomes clear that mental illness cannot be ruled out as an epi‐phenomenon, but is not a necessary condition either. The paper draws on work in psychiatric nosology on dimensional and categorical conceptions of illn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychopathology will seldom be a causal factor in the engagement of violent extremism and terrorism. However, specific psychological functions and processes, particularly maladaptive ones, might be relevant for understanding a person's pathway into and through violent extremism and terrorist activity (5,8,30). Commitment to an ideology that justifies the use of violence, and grievances about perceived injustice, and the anger or outrage in response to perceived injustice are specific for violent extremism and mostly for terrorism (5,7,(31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychopathology will seldom be a causal factor in the engagement of violent extremism and terrorism. However, specific psychological functions and processes, particularly maladaptive ones, might be relevant for understanding a person's pathway into and through violent extremism and terrorist activity (5,8,30). Commitment to an ideology that justifies the use of violence, and grievances about perceived injustice, and the anger or outrage in response to perceived injustice are specific for violent extremism and mostly for terrorism (5,7,(31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some covariates measured exposure to other protest-related traumas, but not participant’s prior experience of traumatic events. Mental health issues might sometimes be associated with violent extremism (Gøtzsche-Astrup & Lindekilde, 2019) and prior experience of traumatic events could generate more violent engagement with the police, hence leading to our observation of a link between EPV and degraded mental health. Although we have reasons to believe this is very unlikely, future studies using longitudinal designs should be conducted to rule out this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A four-class solution suggests that severity is not linear but might be better represented in (four) 'levels', metaphorically reminiscent of energy-dependent electron orbits in quantum mechanics. This provides a new perspective to the extensive discussion about the dimensional vs. categorical nature of mental health disorders [49][50][51][52]; so that mental health disorders might be a mix of both. Further, these four classes differed with respect to within-class variability: with increasing overall severity between the four classes, the within-class phenomenological richness (variability) increased, too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%