2021
DOI: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00225-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eisenbud–Wigner–Smith time delay in atom–laser interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase shift difference between the d 0,±1 and s waves is around 0 with a maximum deviation around 0.04 π for the d 0 -wave at Θ T = 0 ∘ , and 0.06 π for the d ±1 -wave at Θ T = 20 ∘ . Here, the partial-wave phase shift includes two main components, , where is the one-photon scattering phase shift 46 during the transition of s → p 0 —i.e., the EWS time delay in the time domain 26 , 27 —and is the continuum-continuum phase shift following the transitions of p 0 → s , or p 0 → d 0 and d ±1 induced by NIR photon absorption or emission in the long-range Coulomb potential of the ionic core 24 . Since all partial waves in the measured sideband arise from the same intermediate p 0 state, the observed skew-angle dependence of the partial-wave phase shift must originate from the continuum-continuum transition process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase shift difference between the d 0,±1 and s waves is around 0 with a maximum deviation around 0.04 π for the d 0 -wave at Θ T = 0 ∘ , and 0.06 π for the d ±1 -wave at Θ T = 20 ∘ . Here, the partial-wave phase shift includes two main components, , where is the one-photon scattering phase shift 46 during the transition of s → p 0 —i.e., the EWS time delay in the time domain 26 , 27 —and is the continuum-continuum phase shift following the transitions of p 0 → s , or p 0 → d 0 and d ±1 induced by NIR photon absorption or emission in the long-range Coulomb potential of the ionic core 24 . Since all partial waves in the measured sideband arise from the same intermediate p 0 state, the observed skew-angle dependence of the partial-wave phase shift must originate from the continuum-continuum transition process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above examples are in no way exhaustive; they are illustrative of a few of the consequences of the small spin-orbit force on the atomic photoionization process. These suggest that the spin-flip channels, engendered by the spin-orbit force, will also be important in attosecond photoemission time delay, which has been the focus of quite a number of investigations over the past decade or so (see, for example, [20][21][22] and references therein), particularly in the neighborhood of Cooper minima where, the non-spinflip channel amplitudes become quite small. In addition, as pointed out by Fano [1], there are also implications in other aspects of atomic physics.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been directly measured in systems ranging from atoms to the condensed phase, leading to much debate about interpretation of experimental results especially when they are compared and matched to theoretical estimates and predictions [46]. Deshmukh et al present an instructive tutorial on the Eisenbud-Wigner-Smith time delay from a theoretical perspective [47].…”
Section: Theoretical Aspects Of Strong Light-matter Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%