“…In addition, the “transosseous‐equivalent” or “Suture‐Bridge” configurations became increasingly popular [24]. This is because of superior biomechanical properties like higher ultimate tension load, less gap formation and a maximised contact area at the rotator cuff footprint [16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 32]. Despite of technical improvements, retear rates remain high and clinical outcome is comparable to single‐row techniques [2, 5, 14, 17, 28].…”