2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11678-011-0102-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einzelreihe, Doppelreihe oder transossäre Refixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the “transosseous‐equivalent” or “Suture‐Bridge” configurations became increasingly popular [24]. This is because of superior biomechanical properties like higher ultimate tension load, less gap formation and a maximised contact area at the rotator cuff footprint [16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 32]. Despite of technical improvements, retear rates remain high and clinical outcome is comparable to single‐row techniques [2, 5, 14, 17, 28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the “transosseous‐equivalent” or “Suture‐Bridge” configurations became increasingly popular [24]. This is because of superior biomechanical properties like higher ultimate tension load, less gap formation and a maximised contact area at the rotator cuff footprint [16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 32]. Despite of technical improvements, retear rates remain high and clinical outcome is comparable to single‐row techniques [2, 5, 14, 17, 28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Darüber hinaus ist die arthroskopische RM-Rekonstruktion aufgrund der Operationszeit und v. a. wegen des Materialverbrauchs in Zeiten zunehmenden Kostendrucks sicherlich das teurere Verfahren [6]. Lediglich die freie transossäre Naht (z.…”
unclassified