Einstellungen zur Mitbestimmung der Arbeitnehmer – Welchen Einfluss haben Mitbestimmungserfahrungen?

Nienhüser, Werner; Glück, Esther; Hoßfeld, Heiko

doi:10.5771/0342-300x-2016-3-161

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although they are also not especially trained in the field of CMDs, they are often approached by employees when it comes to trouble with their superior, which in turn makes them a relevant key player for prevention. Cooperation between employee representatives and superiors is a delicate topic as well, but would exceed the scope of this paper [56].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Should Play a Key Role in Preventing Common Mental Disorders that Affect Employees in the Workplace? Results of a Survey with Occupational Health Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, Psychotherapists, and Human Resource Managers

Michaelis

Balint

Junne³

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rising burden of common mental disorders (CMDs) in employees requires strategies for prevention. No systematic data exist about how those involved perceive their roles, responsibilities, and interactions with other professional groups. Therefore, we performed a multi-professional standardized survey with health professionals in Germany. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 133 occupational health physicians (OHPs), 136 primary care physicians (PCPs), 186 psychotherapists (PTs), and 172 human resource managers (HRMs). Inter alia, they were asked which health professionals working in the company health service and in the outpatient care or in the sector of statutory insurance agents should play a key role in the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of CMDs in employees. The McNemar test was used in order to compare the attributed roles among the professionals involved. With regard to CMDs, all the professional groups involved in this study declared OHPs as the most relevant pillar in the field of prevention. In primary prevention, HRMs regarded themselves, OHPs, and health insurance agents as equally relevant in terms of prevention. PTs indicated an important role for employee representatives in this field. In secondary prevention, PCPs were regarded as important as OHPs. HRMs indicated themselves as equally important as OHPs and PCPs. In tertiary prevention, only OHPs identified themselves as main protagonists. The other groups marked a variety of several professions. There is a common acceptance from the parties involved that might help the first steps be taken toward overcoming barriers, e.g., by developing a common framework for quality-assured intersectional cooperation in the field of CMD prevention in employees.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Should Play a Key Role in Preventing Common Mental Disorders that Affect Employees in the Workplace? Results of a Survey with Occupational Health Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, Psychotherapists, and Human Resource Managers

Michaelis

Balint

Junne³

et al. 2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mehr individuelle Beteiligung durch stärkere kollektive Mitbestimmung – gerade in einer globalisierten und digitalisierten Arbeitswelt

Bolte

2020

Zukunftsfähige Unternehmensführung in Forschung Und Praxis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Einstellung von Verwaltungsmitarbeiter/innen zu Online-Partizipation im Spannungsfeld zwischen Öffentlichkeit und Bürokratie / The attitudes of government employees towards online participation between the public sphere and bureaucracy

Nguyen¹

2022

dms

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Infolge von Entwicklungen wie Vertrauensdefiziten gegenüber etablierten Entscheidungsprozessen und der fortlaufenden Digitalisierung wird elektronische Bürgerbeteiligung durch die Kommunalverwaltungen zunehmend fokussiert. Trotz des Potenzials der Einbeziehung von Bürger/innenmeinungen zeigt sich eine große Heterogenität in Bezug auf die Anzahl, den Umfang und den Erfolg von Online-Partizipation. Um die Institutionalisierung und den Erfolg zu fördern, ist die Einstellung der Kommunalverwaltungsmitarbeiter/innen von zentraler Bedeutung. Die Studie untersucht mithilfe eines qualitativen Forschungsdesigns, aus welchen Inhalten sich die Einstellung der Mitarbeiter/innen gegenüber Online-Partizipation zusammensetzt und wie diese entsteht. Dazu werden Aspekte wie die konkrete Arbeit an den Verfahren, der organisationale Kontext, die berufliche Sozialisation oder individuelle Faktoren analysiert. Aufgrund der Relevanz für die Durchführung der Verfahren werden dabei die verantwortlichen Mitarbeiter/innen der Fachbereiche für Bürger/innenbeteiligung betrachtet. Die Ergebnisse zeigen eine hohe Relevanz von individuellen Eigenschaften, der Verwaltungsführung sowie der Bürger/innen als Adressat/innen der Projekte.

show abstract

Einstellungen zur Mitbestimmung der Arbeitnehmer – Welchen Einfluss haben Mitbestimmungserfahrungen?

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Who Should Play a Key Role in Preventing Common Mental Disorders that Affect Employees in the Workplace? Results of a Survey with Occupational Health Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, Psychotherapists, and Human Resource Managers

Who Should Play a Key Role in Preventing Common Mental Disorders that Affect Employees in the Workplace? Results of a Survey with Occupational Health Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, Psychotherapists, and Human Resource Managers

Mehr individuelle Beteiligung durch stärkere kollektive Mitbestimmung – gerade in einer globalisierten und digitalisierten Arbeitswelt

Die Einstellung von Verwaltungsmitarbeiter/innen zu Online-Partizipation im Spannungsfeld zwischen Öffentlichkeit und Bürokratie / The attitudes of government employees towards online participation between the public sphere and bureaucracy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About