DOI: 10.2969/aspm/01820011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einstein–Kähler Metrics with Positive Ricci Curvature

Abstract: and the character :F §4. Chern-Simons invariants and the group lifting of :F Ricci-Positive Case §5. The uniqueness theorem §6. Existence of Einstein-Kahler metrics I §7. Existence of Einstein-Kahler metrics II & Appendix 13 §1. Matsushima's obstru.ction and Kobayashi's semistability Let M be a compact complex connected m-dimensional manifold endowed with a Kahler form w. We then write w in the form where (z1, z2, ... , zm) is a system of holomorphic local coordinates on M. Denote by I: Ra/3 dza ® dzt3 the Ric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cit., pp. [116][117][118]. In fact, as Eells-Sampson observe, when f is an immersion, (7.4) can also be proved using the Gauss equations.…”
Section: Uniformity Of the Metric Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cit., pp. [116][117][118]. In fact, as Eells-Sampson observe, when f is an immersion, (7.4) can also be proved using the Gauss equations.…”
Section: Uniformity Of the Metric Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 2.6 [Futaki et al 1990;Mabuchi 1987;Guan 1995a, Lemma 3]. We can regard U as a moment map corresponding to (g,J H ) and g τ as the symplectic reduction ofg at U (τ ).…”
Section: Existence Of the Extremal Solitons On Certain Completions Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Corollary 1. First of all, by [FMS90] (see also [Fut83] and [WAN91]) the Futaki invariant of X is non-zero, hence X does not admit a Kähler-Einstein metrics. To prove the rest of the corollary, we fix a (C * ) 4 -action on X in the following way: Consider the standard embeddings of O P 2 (−1) and O P 1 (−1) in to C 3 × P 2 and C 2 × P 1 respectively:…”
Section: Proof Of Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%