Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften

Dilthey, Wilhelm

doi:10.13109/9783666303012

Cited by 99 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In discussing the relationship between Cultural Science and 'Kulturwissenschaften', I go back to the writings of Wilhelm Dilthey (1883Dilthey ( , 1910, who is arguably the most influential thinker in creating the synthesis of Geisteswissenschaft. 5 In the course of his academic career, Dilthey assumed Hegel's Chair at Berlin.…”

Section: The Objectivity Of Geist and The Possibility Of Cultural Scimentioning

confidence: 99%

Dilthey and Darwin Combined? 19th Century Geisteswissenschaft for 21st Century Cultural Science

Herrmann‐Pillath

2018

Cultural Science Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper explores the relevance of Dilthey’s conceptualisation of the ‘Geisteswissenschaften’ (human sciences) for Cultural Science. In a nutshell, I argue that Cultural Science is Dilthey plus Darwin. In this effort, I define the Geisteswissenschaften as ‘performative sciences’: Taking economics as an example, I show that the Geisteswissenschaften are sciences which are ontologically productive in creating and performing the object of their research. That means, they are inherently normative since they entail critical reflexivity as a major mode of research. Following Dilthey, Geisteswissenschaften are deeply historical, which implies that their disciplinary structure is evolving together with their objects. Therefore, I argue that the 19th century division of disciplines needs to be thoroughly overhauled in the 21st century, including the division between economics and sociology, which is a left-over from 19th century nation-state development. New disciplines, with Cultural Science and Technosphere Science as prime examples, must be established to cope with the challenges of our times: where human agency, culture and technology have blurred long-established boundaries separating nature, culture and society; where identity and meaning have become global, fluid, contested and reflexive phenomena; and where nature (the environment) and culture (cities) are inextricably interrelated in the dynamics of the emergent Anthropocene system.

show abstract

Section: The Objectivity Of Geist and The Possibility Of Cultural Scimentioning

confidence: 99%

Dilthey and Darwin Combined? 19th Century Geisteswissenschaft for 21st Century Cultural Science

Herrmann‐Pillath

2018

Cultural Science Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…He believes the main object of spiritual knowledge includes the life of mental ability, but natural sciences mainly for the study of nature; spiritual knowledge mainly studies the meaning relations in the life world, but natural science mainly study the cause and effect relationship in the physical world. [3] Rickert proposed the division of nature science and cultural science, and strictly distinguished them with material and form. According to the classification principle of material, the object of natural science is nature, but the object of cultural science is culture and value.…”

Section: Scientific Law and Its Forecast Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific Law and Human Will

Zhang¹

2016

Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nesta perspectiva, o que mais importa é a qualidade dos vínculos que os indiví-duos das gerações mantêm em conjunto. Em consonância com esta abordagem, Dilthey (1989) argumentou que a questão das gerações exigiu a análise do tempo da experiência medido exclusivamente em termos qualitativos.…”

Section: A Abordagem Historicista De Diltheyunclassified

O conceito de geração nas teorias sobre juventude

Feixa

Leccardi

2010

Soc. estado.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Desde Augusto Comte e Karl Mannheim (mas também desde José Ortega y Gasset e Antonio Gramsci), o conceito de geração tem sido um tema relevante nas ciências humanas e sociais. Como metáfora para a construção social do tempo, tem sido uma das categorias mais influentes não só no debate teórico, mas também no impacto público das pesquisas sobre juventude. Mesmo que o uso e abuso do conceito esteja enraizado no contexto europeu no período entre a Grande Guerra e a Segunda Guerra Mundial, tem sido relevante nos debates ideológicos e políticos de outras regiões. Este artigo representa uma tentativa de repensar o conceito de geração a partir de uma perspectiva histórica, destacando-se sua relevância para os debates contemporâneos sobre juventude.
Since August Compte and Karl Mannheim (but also since José Ortega y Gasset and Antonio Gramsci), the concept of generation has been a relevant topic in social sciences and humanities. As a metaphor for the social construction of time, it has been one of the most influential categories, not only in the theoretical debate but also in the public effects of youth research. Even if the uses and abuses of the concept are rooted in the European context during the period between I and II World War, it has been relevant in the ideological and political debates of other regions. This paper is an attempt to rethink the concept of generation from an historical perspective, pointing-out its relevance for contemporary youth debates

show abstract

Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften

Cited by 99 publications

References 0 publications

Dilthey and Darwin Combined? 19th Century Geisteswissenschaft for 21st Century Cultural Science

Dilthey and Darwin Combined? 19th Century Geisteswissenschaft for 21st Century Cultural Science

Scientific Law and Human Will

O conceito de geração nas teorias sobre juventude

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About