1974
DOI: 10.1002/crat.19740091009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einfluß der Stapelfehlerenergie auf den kristallographischen Umgitterungsmechanismus der γ/α‐Umwandlung in hochlegierten Stählen

Abstract: Der Umgitterungsmechanismus der Phasenumwandlung kub.‐flz. γ → kub.‐rz. α hängt von der Stapelfehlerenergie (SFE) ab. Bei großer SFE ist eine Verschiebung von (111)γ‐Ebenen durch Shockleysche Halbversetzungen vom Typ b = 1/6 [211]γ nicht möglich, und die direkte Umgitterung γ → α erfolgt durch zwei homogene Scherungen um 19°28′ bzw. 10°32′. Bei einer SFE unterhalb von etwa 15 bis 20 erg/cm2 findet diese Abgleitung jedoch statt, wobei sich die ϵ‐Phase bildet. Abhängig von der thermodynamischen Stabilität kann d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in other grains, where the islands were much larger, they were identified as α'-martensite via EBSD [89]. This is in very good agreement with [90] showing a direct phase transition from the austenite (fcc) to martensite (bcc). Figure 10(c) shows the planar arrangement of individual dislocations along two different slip systems.…”
Section: Planar Dislocation Arrangement and Martensitic Phase Transfosupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, in other grains, where the islands were much larger, they were identified as α'-martensite via EBSD [89]. This is in very good agreement with [90] showing a direct phase transition from the austenite (fcc) to martensite (bcc). Figure 10(c) shows the planar arrangement of individual dislocations along two different slip systems.…”
Section: Planar Dislocation Arrangement and Martensitic Phase Transfosupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It has been known for a long time that highmanganese steels are plastically deformed through strain-induced martensite formation, mechanical twinning, and, finally, pure dislocation glide, due to increases in the SFE value. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The SFE of these steel grades increases intensively as a result of increases in the carbon [12] and aluminum [13,14] contents as well as the temperature, [15,16] while it decreases as a result of increases in the austenite grain size. [17,18] The effect of manganese (>15 wt pct) on increases in the SFE has been debated in several research articles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Calculated (a) self-diffusivity of bcc Fe in comparison with experimental data [30] and (b) grain boundary diffusivity on some grain boundaries in bcc Fe Fig. 4 Effect of Mn on the intrinsic stacking fault energy of fcc Fe (a) by the present MEAM calculation, [8] and (b) by experiments [32,33] or thermodynamic calculation. [34] The stacking fault energy of pure Fe is set to be zero in (a)…”
Section: Computation Of Stacking Fault Energymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the present calculation, the stacking fault energy of fcc Fe decreases up to about 5 at.% Mn and then increases with increasing Mn content. Figure 4(b) shows the effect of Mn on the stacking fault energy in various austenitic steels obtained from experiments [32,33] or a thermodynamic calculation. [34] Even though there are differences in the absolute values between the present calculation and literature data and also among the literature data sets, all results show a qualitative agreement in that the stacking fault energy initially decreases with Mn addition and then increases with further addition of Mn.…”
Section: Computation Of Stacking Fault Energymentioning
confidence: 99%