2010
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201002296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ein quadratisch‐planarer Ruthenium(II)‐Komplex mit Low‐Spin‐ Konfiguration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary results reported for 2 (DFT, B3LYP/6-31 + G**) indicated a small singlet/triplet excitation energy. [14] Revaluation within the present comprehensive study using density functional theory with several functionals and referencing of these results using coupled cluster calculations on simpler, PR 2 -truncated models (R = Me, H; the Supporting Information) corroborate this view. Note that the variation of the functional shows the typical behavior, that is, a slight preference for the higher spin-state for hybrid func- ).…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculationssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Preliminary results reported for 2 (DFT, B3LYP/6-31 + G**) indicated a small singlet/triplet excitation energy. [14] Revaluation within the present comprehensive study using density functional theory with several functionals and referencing of these results using coupled cluster calculations on simpler, PR 2 -truncated models (R = Me, H; the Supporting Information) corroborate this view. Note that the variation of the functional shows the typical behavior, that is, a slight preference for the higher spin-state for hybrid func- ).…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculationssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…[16] The highfield shift of one CH 3 1 H NMR signal at d = À0.61 ppm suggests CÀH agostic interactions with the metal center at the vacant coordination site, which is confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (see below). This observation contrasts with [RuHCl{L 2 tBu}], [14] which is attributed to the weaker chloride versus hydride trans influence in 4.…”
Section: Syntheses and Spectroscopic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DFT analysis of the d 8 ‐M{MeB(CH 2 PMe 2 ) 3 } (M=Rh, Ir) fragments indicates a small difference in energy in favor of the triplet versus the singlet state (3.0 and 2.0 kcal mol −1 for Rh and Ir, respectively). However, this difference may be meaningless because of the tendency of the B3LYP functional to stabilize high‐spin species . The consequences of the spin pairing are: a distortion of the framework that results in distinct M−P bond lengths and P‐M‐P bond angles that reduces the symmetry from C 3 (triplet) to C s (singlet), and a drastic energy difference (2.36 and 2.13 eV for Rh and Ir, respectively) between the HOMO (2e a ) and LUMO (2e s ) that stabilizes the singlet state and leaves empty the orbital 2e s of parentage d yz .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%