2011
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.126.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eikonal Reaction Theory for Neutron Removal Reaction

Abstract: We present an accurate method of treating the one-neutron removal reaction at intermediate incident energies induced by both nuclear and Coulomb interactions. In the method, the nuclear and Coulomb breakup processes are consistently treated by the method of continuum discretized coupled channels without making the adiabatic approximation to the Coulomb interaction, so that the removal cross section calculated never diverges. This method is applied to recently measured one-neutron removal cross section for 31 N… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
91
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nonadiabatic treatment of the Coulomb breakup processes is needed to correctly describe the effect of the long-range Coulomb force. Though several attempts to avoid the divergence are performed in a few-body system [41][42][43][44][45], they are too computer-time expensive to apply to a nucleus-nucleus case. A simple, practical way to avoid the divergence problem is to replace the Coulomb phase that leads to the divergence by a divergence-free perturbative term assuming the dominance of the E1 field.…”
Section: B Equivalent-photon Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonadiabatic treatment of the Coulomb breakup processes is needed to correctly describe the effect of the long-range Coulomb force. Though several attempts to avoid the divergence are performed in a few-body system [41][42][43][44][45], they are too computer-time expensive to apply to a nucleus-nucleus case. A simple, practical way to avoid the divergence problem is to replace the Coulomb phase that leads to the divergence by a divergence-free perturbative term assuming the dominance of the E1 field.…”
Section: B Equivalent-photon Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The def-WS model with AMD deformation is thus a handy way of simulating AMD or AMD-RGM densities. The def-WS model with AMD deformation also reproduces measured σ R for [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Mg [18]. As another advantage of the def-WS model, one can fine tune the theoretical result to the experimental data precisely by changing the potential parameters or the deformation parameter slightly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Very recently, the folding model with AMD projectile density succeeded in reproducing measured σ I for [28][29][30]32 Ne by virtue of large deformation of the projectiles [36]. For 31 Ne, the theoretical calculation underestimated measured σ I by about 3%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the model has been applied to light targets. Lately a way of making Coulomb corrections to Glauber-model calculations was proposed [7,8]; the divergent dipole component of the eikonal Coulomb phase is replaced by that estimated by the first-order perturbation.The Coulomb problem is solved by the eikonal reaction theory (ERT) [17,18] in which Coulomb breakup is treated accurately with the continuum discretized coupledchannels method (CDCC) [19][20][21]. For one-proton andneutron removal cross sections of deuteron scattering at 200 MeV/nucleon, the Glauber-model results are found to be largely deviated from the ERT results for heavier targets [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [17], ERT was applied to recently measured one-neutron removal cross sections for 31 Ne scattering from 12 C and 208 Pb targets at 230 MeV/nucleon [22]. Spectroscopic factors and asymptotic normalization coefficients for the 30 Ne + n bound system are consistently deduced from the measured cross sections for both the light and heavy targets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%