1992
DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90032-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eight novel inactivating germ line mutations at the APC gene identified by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In screening for mutations of the APC gene, many techniques, such as SSCP analysis (Groden et al 1991) , denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (Fodde et al 1992), and ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) , have been employed. SSCP and DGGE have been preferentially used for their simplicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In screening for mutations of the APC gene, many techniques, such as SSCP analysis (Groden et al 1991) , denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (Fodde et al 1992), and ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) , have been employed. SSCP and DGGE have been preferentially used for their simplicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This event serves to decrease the C1 complexity of a sequence. Thus, for example, a short micro-deletion in the APC gene [Fodde et al, 1992] [AAAGAAATAGatag-TCTTCCTTTA] gives rise to a slight decrease in complexity C1 from 13 to 12. As follows from decompositions (1) and (2), two copies of a direct repeat thought to have been responsible for mediating the micro-deletion are underlined.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Mutagenesis and Sequence Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the NTHL1 gene with a recessive inheritance of the phenotype, predisposing to BER associated adenomatous polyposis and CRC (Weren et al, 2015). However, in the attenuated and mixed polyposis syndromes only a fraction of the disease‐causing mutations can still be identified (Fodde et al, 1992; Miyoshi et al, 1992; Lynch et al, 1995). The low mutation‐detection rate implicates the probable presence of additional unknown disease‐causing genes and possibly also recognition of new mutation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%