1992
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620330510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eight nodes or nine?

Abstract: SUMMARYThe chief advantage claimed for nine-noded shell elements is that they can pass constant curvature patch tests with bilinear element geometry while eight-noded shell elements cannot. It is shown that a simple modification of the shape functions of an eight-noded element can make this advantage disappear. Test results confirm this result and show that the performance of a modified eight-noded element is similar to that of recently reported nine-noded elements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the reduced order integration, the performance of QUAD9 is, however, worse than that of QUAD8. An excellent comparison of QUAD8 and QUAD9 is given by MacNeal and Harder [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the reduced order integration, the performance of QUAD9 is, however, worse than that of QUAD8. An excellent comparison of QUAD8 and QUAD9 is given by MacNeal and Harder [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacNeal and Harder [15] proposed a method by which the shape functions of an improved 8-node quadrilateral plane element are obtained based on the shape functions of QUAD9 by 'constraining rigidly' the interior node. This results in an excellent element that can reproduce exactly a Cartesian quadratic displacement ÿeld when the element geometry is of bilinear shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, each original element is subdivided into four elements. Repeat this division again and again, the total number of the elements in the refined mesh after each action will be 4 A standard front method solver is used for elements Q8 and HSF-Q8, while a modified unsymmetric front method solver is used for elements Q8, HSF-Q8, US-QUAD8, and US-ATFQ8. The program…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits and drawbacks of both elements have been discussed thoroughly in the literature, e.g. [48,49,101]. The 9 noded Lagrange element has the advantage of being less sensitive to the position of the midside nodes, and it passes the out-of-plane bending patch test when the sides are curved.…”
Section: Parameterization Of Quadratic Shear and Thickness Deformablementioning
confidence: 99%