2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eight Heuristic Planning Techniques Applied to Three Increasingly Difficult Wildlife Planning Problems: A Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Murray and Church 1996;McDill and Braze 2000;Richards and Gunn 2000;Bettinger et al 2002;Boston and Bettinger 2006;Tóth et al 2013), where clear cutting is the only final harvest option, our approach include two final harvest options. It is also important to note that the two final harvest options have different implications for the regeneration costs and regeneration lag (time from harvest to establishment of new forest).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murray and Church 1996;McDill and Braze 2000;Richards and Gunn 2000;Bettinger et al 2002;Boston and Bettinger 2006;Tóth et al 2013), where clear cutting is the only final harvest option, our approach include two final harvest options. It is also important to note that the two final harvest options have different implications for the regeneration costs and regeneration lag (time from harvest to establishment of new forest).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational experience reveals the need to test various heuristic methods for pre-solving the robust models with harvest flow constraints, as in the case of complex spatial harvest scheduling problems (see, for example, [31]). Palma and Nelson [5] also draw attention to the problem of the size of robust programming models, but point out that the models are still linear, which is their greatest advantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%