2020
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.391902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigenvectors of polarization coherency matrices

Abstract: Calculation of the eigenvectors of two- and three-dimensional coherency matrices, and the four-dimensional coherency matrix associated with a Mueller matrix, is considered, especially for algebraic cases, in the light of recently published algorithms. The preferred approach is based on a combination of an evaluation of the characteristic polynomial and an adjugate matrix. The diagonal terms of the coherency matrix are given in terms of the characteristic polynomial of reduced matrices as functions of the eigen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a barycentric eigenvalue space has been described as a way of representing a general depolarizing transformation in Refs. [87,91,92]. The origin represents a perfect depolarizer.…”
Section: Barycentric Eigenvalue Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a barycentric eigenvalue space has been described as a way of representing a general depolarizing transformation in Refs. [87,91,92]. The origin represents a perfect depolarizer.…”
Section: Barycentric Eigenvalue Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A depolarization space gives information not just on how much light is depolarized but also on how it is depolarized by the sample. The definition of a depolarization space is not unique 52 , 53 and a choice must be done based on multiple criteria such as discrimination power between depolarization metrics, computation time, adequacy to the physical problem treated among others 54 . The depolarization space used in this work is composed by the IPPs 55 , which can be directly deduced from the measured Mueller matrix of the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Poincaré sphere [1] provides a simple and meaningful representation of those polarization states whose electric field fluctuates in a fixed plane (2D states). Despite the interest of such a particular type of polarization states, which is commonly applied in many problems involving paraxial fields and is characterized through the conventional four Stokes parameters [2], or (equivalently) by means of the 2 × 2 polarization matrix (or coherency matrix) [3][4][5][6][7][8], the description of a general polarization state involves nine generalized Stokes parameters [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] instead of the conventional four ones, and therefore their geometric representation through a generalized Poincaré sphere is determined by an eight-dimensional object, which does not admit a simple geometric and physical interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the geometric representation introduced by Dennis [33] for general three-dimensional (3D) polarization states is studied and interpreted in terms of the intrinsic Stokes parameters [21] and other meaningful descriptors that are invariant under rotations of the reference frame [17][18][19][20][21][22][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. The classification introduced in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%