2012
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2012.255.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigenvalue estimates on domains in complete noncompact Riemannian manifolds

Abstract: In this paper, we obtain universal inequalities for eigenvalues of the Dirichlet eigenvalue problem of the Laplacian and the clamped plate problem on a bounded domain in an n-dimensional (n ≥ 3) noncompact simply connected complete Riemannian manifold with sectional curvature Sec satisfying −K 2 ≤ Sec ≤ −k 2 , where K ≥ k ≥ 0 are constants. When M is ‫ވ‬ n (−1) (n ≥ 3), these inequalities become ones previously found by Cheng and Yang.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most central problems is to establish Payne-Pólya-Weinberger-Yang-type inequalities for the eigenvalues of the problem ∆ 2 g u = Γu in Ω, u = ∂u ∂n = 0 on ∂Ω, (1.4) where Ω is a bounded domain in an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M, g), ∆ 2 g stands for the biharmonic Laplace-Beltrami operator on (M, g) and ∂ ∂n is the outward normal derivative on ∂Ω, respectively; see e.g. Chen, Zheng and Lu [7], Cheng, Ichikawa and Mametsuka [8], Cheng and Yang [9,10,11], Wang and Xia [39]. Instead of (1.2), one naturally considers the fundamental tone of Ω ⊂ M by Γ g (Ω) := Γ g,n (Ω) = inf u∈W 2,2 0 (Ω)\{0} Ω (∆ g u) 2 dv g Ω u 2 dv g , (1.5) where dv g denotes the canonical measure on (M, g), and W 2,2 0 (Ω) is the usual Sobolev space on (M, g), see Hebey [19]; in fact, it turns out that Γ g (Ω) is the first eigenvalue to (1.4).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most central problems is to establish Payne-Pólya-Weinberger-Yang-type inequalities for the eigenvalues of the problem ∆ 2 g u = Γu in Ω, u = ∂u ∂n = 0 on ∂Ω, (1.4) where Ω is a bounded domain in an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M, g), ∆ 2 g stands for the biharmonic Laplace-Beltrami operator on (M, g) and ∂ ∂n is the outward normal derivative on ∂Ω, respectively; see e.g. Chen, Zheng and Lu [7], Cheng, Ichikawa and Mametsuka [8], Cheng and Yang [9,10,11], Wang and Xia [39]. Instead of (1.2), one naturally considers the fundamental tone of Ω ⊂ M by Γ g (Ω) := Γ g,n (Ω) = inf u∈W 2,2 0 (Ω)\{0} Ω (∆ g u) 2 dv g Ω u 2 dv g , (1.5) where dv g denotes the canonical measure on (M, g), and W 2,2 0 (Ω) is the usual Sobolev space on (M, g), see Hebey [19]; in fact, it turns out that Γ g (Ω) is the first eigenvalue to (1.4).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ω is a bounded domain in an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M, g), ∆ 2 g stands for the biharmonic Laplace-Beltrami operator on (M, g) and ∂ ∂n is the outward normal derivative on ∂Ω, respectively; see e.g. Chen, Zheng and Lu [7], Cheng, Ichikawa and Mametsuka [8], Cheng and Yang [9,10,11], Wang and Xia [39]. Instead of (1.2), one naturally considers the fundamental tone of Ω ⊂ M by Γ g (Ω) := Γ g,n (Ω) = inf…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1.4. The inequality (1.22) is better than the one in [4]. If a ¼ b ¼ 1, the inequality (1.22) is the one of Cheng and Yang [11] (see (1.8)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Remark 1.1. When is an n-dimensional compact homogeneous Riemannian manifold, a compact minimal submanifold without boundary and a connected bounded domain in the standard unit sphere ‫ޓ‬ N (1), and a connected bounded domain and a compact complex hypersurface without boundary of the complex projective space ‫ސރ‬ n (4) with holomorphic sectional curvature 4, many mathematicians have studied the universal inequalities for eigenvalues and the difference of the consecutive eigenvalues (see [Cheng and Yang 2005;Harrell 1993;Harrell and Michel 1994;Harrell and Stubbe 1997;Li 1980;Yang and Yau 1980;Leung 1991;Sun et al 2008;Chen et al 2012]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%