The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40314-020-01245-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigenvalue bounds of third-order tensors via the minimax eigenvalue of symmetric matrices

Abstract: Upper and lower bounds for H-eigenvalues, Z-spectral radius and C-spectral radius of a thirdorder tensor are given by the minimax eigenvalue of symmetric matrices extracted from this given tensor. As applications, a sufficient condition for third-order nonsingular M-tensors and some valid sufficient conditions for the uniqueness and solvability of the solutions to multi-linear systems, tensor complementarity problems and non-homogeneous systems are proposed. Keywords H-eigenvalues • Z-eigenvalues • C-eigenvalu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…> 0, the M-tensor is also an important application [9]. The estimation of the upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius of a nonnegative tensor is an important element in the study of the spectral problem of nonnegative tensors [14,15], and the application of the relation between the M-tensor and the nonnegative tensor gives an estimate of the upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius of the nonnegative tensor. By analyzing the tensor structure, two classes of quasi-double diagonally dominant tensors are given in this paper, and they are proved to be H-tensors; at the same time, an inequality is given for the estimation of the upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius of the nonnegative tensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…> 0, the M-tensor is also an important application [9]. The estimation of the upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius of a nonnegative tensor is an important element in the study of the spectral problem of nonnegative tensors [14,15], and the application of the relation between the M-tensor and the nonnegative tensor gives an estimate of the upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius of the nonnegative tensor. By analyzing the tensor structure, two classes of quasi-double diagonally dominant tensors are given in this paper, and they are proved to be H-tensors; at the same time, an inequality is given for the estimation of the upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius of the nonnegative tensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qi (2005) gave an eigenvalue inclusion set for real symmetric tensors, which is a generalization of the well-known Gershgorin set of matrices (Horn and Johnson 2012). Subsequently, due to its fundamental applications in various fields, many researchers are interested in investigating eigenvalue inclusion regions for tensors, e.g., Bu et al (2017), Li and Li (2016a), Li et al (2014Li et al ( , 2020, Xu et al (2019), etc. In 1958, Fan (1958 obtained the famous Ky Fan theorem that plays an important role in the study of the nonnegative eigenvalue problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence and properties on C-eigenpairs of a piezoelectric-type tensor is discussed in [4]. Recently, Che et al [3], Li et al [16], Li et al [17], Liu et al [21], Wang et al [28], Xiong and Liu [30] considered the C-eigenvalue localization and presented many C-eigenvalue inclusion intervals to locate all C-eigenvalues of a piezoelectric-type tensor. However, there is not an efficient solution method to obtain all C-eigenvalues of a piezoelectric-type tensor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, we locate all C-eigenvalues of the above eight piezoelectric tensors by using the intervals in Theorems 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5, Theorems 2.2 and 2.4 in [3], Theorem 2 of [16], Theorem 7 of [17], Theorem 2.1 of [21], Theorem 2.1 in [28] and Theorem 2.1 of [30]. Numerical results are showed in Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%