2006
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200600277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigenmobilities in background electrolytes for CZE. V. Intensity (amplitudes) of system peaks

Abstract: Eigenmobilities in background electrolytes for CZE. V. Intensity (amplitudes) of system peaksWe present a mathematical model of CZE based on the concept of eigenmobilitiesthe eigenvalues of matrix M tied to the linearized governing equations of electromigration, and the spectral decomposition of matrix M into matrices of amplitudes P j . Any peak in an electropherogram, regardless of whether it is an analyte peak or a system peak (system zone), is matched with its matrix P j . This enables calculation of the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Adapted from [11], with permission.) most of them the other eigenmobility is very small and forms a stationary system zone which can serve in practice as the EOF marker.…”
Section: Non-conservation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Adapted from [11], with permission.) most of them the other eigenmobility is very small and forms a stationary system zone which can serve in practice as the EOF marker.…”
Section: Non-conservation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…System peaks are peaks that are recorded by the detector but they are not associated with any separated analyte. System peaks are in fact disturbing phenomena accompanying separation in CZE [18]. They are moving disturbances in the originally uniform concentration of the BGE, which were originally caused by the injection of the sample into the separation column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent published works do now allow predicting system peaks in a given BGE [14,25], and such approaches seem critical to obtain a robust method when using an indirect detection scheme [1,14,26,27]. As pointed out by Beckers and Bocek [28], multivalent weak electrolytes should be avoided when possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, for more complex BGE, such as the ones containing multivalent co-ions and/or weak analytes, no analytical solutions have been proposed so far and numerical simulations are a valuable tool [11,12] to maximise the sensitivity of key analytes. For example, it has been shown that when the mobility of an analyte becomes closer to the one of a system peak, the TR value increases [13,14] until the extreme case where the mobility of an analyte equals the mobility of a system peak. In this case, a resonance phenomenon occurs and the response in indirect detection grows with time [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%