2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2016.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eichler–Selberg type identities for mixed mock modular forms

Abstract: Using holomorphic projection, we work out a parametrization for all relations of products (resp. Rankin-Cohen brackets) of weight 3 2 mock modular forms with holomorphic shadow and weight 1 2 modular forms in the spirit of the Kronecker-Hurwitz class number relations. In particular we obtain new proofs for several class number relations among which some are classical, others are relatively new. We also obtain similar results for the mock theta functions.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following theorem is a special case of a more general theorem due to Mertens (cf. Theorem 6.3 of [42]). See also [41].…”
Section: Holomorphic Projection Of Weight 1 2 Mock Modular Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following theorem is a special case of a more general theorem due to Mertens (cf. Theorem 6.3 of [42]). See also [41].…”
Section: Holomorphic Projection Of Weight 1 2 Mock Modular Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove Theorem 1.1 it suffices to prove that these multiplicities are non-negative integers. To prove Theorem 1.2 we apply recent work [42] of Mertens on the holomorphic projection of weight 1 2 mock modular forms, which generalizes earlier work [41] of Imamoglu, Raum and Richter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Imamoglu, Raum, and Richter [15] have obtained general theorems in this direction with applications to Ramanujan's mock theta functions in mind. This work, as well as the preprint [20] by the first author, are based on unpublished notes of Zagier. Here we continue this theme, and we show that the L (ν) (f 1 , f 2 ; τ ), again for ν = k 1 −k 2 2 , also arise in this way.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that if f is a smooth weight k ≥ 2 modular form for Γ 0 (N ) with moderate growth at cusps, then its holormorphic projection π hol f lies in M k (Γ 0 (N )). For more on the classical holomorphic projection operator, see [25], [16], [21] and [12].…”
Section: Period Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%