EIA effectiveness in Vietnam: key stakeholder perceptions

Abstract

In line with its rapidly transforming economy, thousands of development proposals undergo Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Vietnam each year. Since its inception in 1993, Vietnam's EIA system has undergone numerous amendments via a suite of legislative reforms to the Law on Environmental Protection (LEP) and its associated Circulars and Decrees, a testament to the Government's will to improve environmental performance. Here we evaluate the effectiveness of Vietnam's EIA system through a unique empirical study focusing on those engaged in the EIA system undertaken in Hanoi in 2016 comprising 20 semi-structured interviews with respondents from government, NGOs, academia, and industry. By evaluating the effectiveness of the EIA system in Vietnam from the stakeholder perspective, this paper aims to identify where, how, and why the EIA system is effective or otherwise. Stakeholders vary in their perceptions of the system. Those external to it identified several inhibiting characteristics. Results suggest that like other developing countries and jurisdictions, Vietnam's EIA procedural performance falls short of EIA goals. Criticisms of discordant dual planning law and environmental management laws, fragmented decision making, conflicts of interest in appraisal committee appointments, and information deprivation that impedes public participation suggest that like other developing countries and jurisdictions, Vietnam's EIA performance, in practice, faces several challenges that potentially undermine its role in environmental protection.

‘Environmental Impact Assessment’ in Drylands: Late Knowledge Penetration or a Deliberate Ignorance for Megaprojects?

“…The author argues that understanding of EIA assessment, mandatory project evaluation, and directives were developed in Iran lately or (likely) ignored for several decades. As it is correctly said, the adoption of EIA by developing countries is a procedural formality rather than "a suitable mechanism to avoid environmental and social harm" [22].…”

“…It is also safe to say, like many other professional service-renderings in the Middle East countries, that EIA undertakings are generally carried out by international consultancy firms unfamiliar with these countries' social and climatic contexts. As it is said, EIA undertakings have resulted from technical export from the US and "applying it to planning environments and cultures that are very different" [22]. Even so, these EIAs are state-sponsored undertakings with likely biased results.…”

Inclusive governance of hydropower on shared rivers? Toward an international legal geography of the Lower Mekong basin

“…All member states now have national laws governing environmental impact assessment and resettlement. These require public participation, although implementation is uneven and often tokenistic, constrained by a lack of resources, a lack of expertise in conducting such assessments, and dependent on the nature of the political regime (Wayakone and Makoto, 2012;Xia, 2020;Clarke and Vu, 2021;Kantamaturapoj et al, 2023). These are also national decision-making processes outside of the remit of the Mekong River Commission, thus creating a "scalar disconnect" between national and regional processes (Suhardiman et al, 2012, p. 572).…”

Evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental impact assessment in East Africa: The case of Rwanda

“…In Rwanda the quality of EIA practitioner is enhanced by the fact that in order to become a junior expert, an applicant needs to do a mandatory professional internship of 3 years, in comparison to other countries like Vietnam for example, in Vietnam anyone who wants to become EIA practitioner should first acquire a certificate in EIA consultancy (Clarke & Vu, 2021).…”