EIA-driven biodiversity mainstreaming in development cooperation: Confronting expectations and practice in the DR Congo

Abstract

Mainstreaming biodiversity in development cooperation activities is called for by scientists and policy-makers alike, as the current biodiversity crisis can only be mitigated if the linkages between biodiversity and human wellbeing are acknowledged. Reconciling biodiversity conservation and human development is a particularly topical challenge in highly biodiverse developing countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where the population is highly dependent on natural resources for their livelihood. This study combines expert interviews with an evaluation of environmental impact assessment (EIA) reports, in order to determine the current motivations, obstacles and effectiveness of biodiversity mainstreaming in the DRC and to assess the framing, the representation and use of biodiversity in recently conducted EIAs in the DRC. Our findings indicate that biodiversity mainstreaming in the DRC is considered challenging due to enduring contextual (e.g. governance) factors; and that there is a strong support base for EIA among the interviewed experts. Turning to actual EIAs that were recently performed in the DRC, the diversity of framings motivating the uptake of biodiversity is remarkable. Instrumental reasons do not thwart intrinsic motivations -which is indicative of a support base for the non-instrumental value of biodiversity. The use of biodiversity baseline data in mitigation measures is low, and the taxonomic resolution of the biodiversity data in EIAs is uneven. Despite these challenges, the potential of EIA in the DRC is considered high, and linkages between project-driven EIA practice and biodiversity data collection and dissemination should be strengthened.

Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values

“… 2019 , Hugé et al. 2020 ). This understanding includes what is commonly known as subjective intrinsic values , which refers to values attributed by people to something that is valuable for its own sake to them and not for its usefulness; this category often includes aesthetic values (van Koppen 2000 , Swift et al.…”

“… 2019 , Hugé et al. 2020 ). This is expressed in many second-generation constitutions (i.e., constitutions that refer to social rights; Jung et al.…”

Five Steps to Inject Transformative Change into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

“…As of 2020, the great majority of parties had submitted NBSAPs to the secretariat, but only 44% had adopted them as policy, and just 39% of countries had actually integrated biodiversity into national planning (CBD 2020f ). Sustainable transitions research shows that it is best to focus on national mainstreaming projects while encouraging countries to strengthen links to local-level efforts to implement changes (Heikkila and Gerlak 2019 , Huge et al 2020 ). For example, China is experimenting with performance incentives for local officials if they meet national biodiversity targets (Wang et al 2020 ).…”

National accounting scheme for biodiversity loss: An international trade perspective

“…Biodiversity is the material basis for human survival and development (Hugé et al, 2020) and is closely related to the well-being of human social life (Xu et al, 2021). It plays a key role in material cycling and energy flow in the ecosystem, which is directly related to the stability and sustainability of ecological and social systems (Blicharska et al, 2019).…”