2011
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A structured approach is recommended (Figure 4), and several articles suggest well-documented approaches to these endeavors. 94,109,115,120–123 The most critical issue is allowing the patient and family time to understand and prepare for the sequence of events and not to influence them to make decisions that are inconsistent with their values. 2 Patients and families often benefit from guided recommendations for care and decision-making at this difficult juncture.…”
Section: End-of-life Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A structured approach is recommended (Figure 4), and several articles suggest well-documented approaches to these endeavors. 94,109,115,120–123 The most critical issue is allowing the patient and family time to understand and prepare for the sequence of events and not to influence them to make decisions that are inconsistent with their values. 2 Patients and families often benefit from guided recommendations for care and decision-making at this difficult juncture.…”
Section: End-of-life Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Withholding and withdrawing cardiac therapeutic supports are generally deemed ethically equivalent under conditions where a death is foreseeable because of underlying disease or where a patient with capacity and decisional authority (may be age-based legally) does not wish to receive the intervention or therapy. 107–112 The extension of discontinuation of life-sustaining therapies beyond ventilator support or critical care therapies to implantable cardiac defibrillators, 112–117 ECMO, 117–121 or ventricular assist devices (VADs) 122,123 is predicated on the same ethical justifications and legal permissions. Implantable cardiac defibrillator deactivation is suggested to decrease additional harm and distress by multiple induced shocks from a defibrillator device at the EOL.…”
Section: End-of-life Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One third of the participants were reluctant to discuss end-of-life issues, but according to existing expert consensus statements 25,26 a discussion about deactivation should take place already in connection with the ICD-implantation. Further, one quarter preferred to keep the shocks in connection with end-of-life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 Having an ICD also incurs sensitive discussions about device deactivation among patients and families. 37 Accordingly, it is recommended that patients with an ICD/CRT-D receive counselling about living with an ICD (QI 04S01).…”
Section: Domain 4: Patient Education and Lifestyle Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%