eHealth Living Lab Micro Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Prototypes through Co-creation

Monguet, Josep María; Ferruzca, Marco; Fernandez, Joaquín del Río; Huerta, Eduardo

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23635-8_18

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature on participatory design is one of the strands of urban development literature, building at least partly on private sector innovation paradigms. Design processes and small-scale experimentation are used to test ideas and for 'failing fast' and learning through the development of 'proto-types' (Monguet et al 2011). Citizens contribute actively through their knowledge and ideas to test the viability of the prototyped services or collaborations.…”

Section: Co-creation In Theory and Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is clear that this dimension draws on the participatory design literature (eg. Monguet et al 2011;Björgvinsson et al 2012) and can be enabled through, for example, living labs, which can facilitate collaborative processes drawing also on the extensive experience of collaborative urban planning (eg. Innes & Booher 2010), but with an added focus on innovation.…”

Section: Roles In Co-creationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation

Lund

2018

SJPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article sets out to establish what we mean by the recent buzzword ‘co-creation’ and what practical application this concept entails for democracy in urban governance, both in theory and practice. The rise of the concept points to a shift in how public participation is understood. Whereas from the 1970s onwards the discussions surrounding participation centred on rights and power, following Sherry Arnstein, participation conceptualised as co-creation instead focuses on including diverse forms of knowledge in urban processes in order to create innovative solutions to complex problems. Consequently, democratic legitimacy now relies to a much greater extent on output, rather than input legitimacy. Rather than provision of inclusive spaces for democratic debate and empowerment of the deprived, which have been the goals of numerous urban participatory efforts in the past, it is the ability to solve complex problems that has become the main criterion for the eval- uation of co-creation. Furthermore, conceptualising participation as co-creation has con- sequences for the roles available to both citizens and public administrators in urban pro- cesses, which has implications for urban governance. An explicit debate, both in academ- ia and in practice, about the normative content and implications of conceptualising partic- ipation as co-creation is therefore salient and necessary.

show abstract

Section: Co-creation In Theory and Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Roles In Co-creationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation

Lund

2018

SJPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For understanding the co-design dimension, one can -unsurprisingly -gain inspiration from the literature on co-design, participatory design, and cocreation. In the co-design literature, design processes and small scale experimentation are used to test ideas and achieve 'failing faster' and learning through the development of 'proto-types' (Monguet et al, 2011). Citizens contribute actively with their knowledge and ideas to test the viability of prototyped services or collaborations.…”

Section: Citizens As Co-innovators -Lessons From the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector – New Perspectives on the Role of Citizens?

Agger

Lund

2017

SJPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative innovation in the public sector is increasingly used as a strategy for balancing citizens’ rising expectations for public services with limited public resources. This article suggests that public polices construct citizens as clients, consumers, or co- producers and thereby encourage or discourage certain behaviours, with different poten- tial contributions to innovation. The article conceptualises a new role, that of citizens’ as co-innovators, and offers an analytical model that can be used in future studies of how public managers can act as civic enablers by creating different spaces for public innova- tion on the basis of the applicable citizen role.

show abstract

eHealth Living Lab Micro Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Prototypes through Co-creation

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation

Co-Creation in Urban Governance: From Inclusion to Innovation

Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector – New Perspectives on the Role of Citizens?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About