2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ehealth literacy and health literacy among immigrants and their descendants compared with women of Danish origin: a cross-sectional study using a multidimensional approach among pregnant women

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore ehealth literacy, ability to actively engage with healthcare providers and health system navigation among pregnant immigrant women and their descendants compared with women of Danish origin.Design and settingA cross-sectional survey at antenatal clinics in 2016, Denmark.ParticipantsPregnant women attending antenatal care (n=405).Outcome measuresThe eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) and two domains from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ): ability to actively engage with healthcare p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, socioeconomic status and educational attainment also influenced the access to, and uptake of e-health services (Hardiker and Grant 2011). The results were consistent with those of previous studies worldwide (Hoogland et al 2020;Shiferaw et al 2020;Villadsen et al 2020). These identified non-modifiable factors can be used to determine which individuals are at risk of poor e-health literacy, and to indentify the vulnerable population that medical staff need to target (Cheng et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, socioeconomic status and educational attainment also influenced the access to, and uptake of e-health services (Hardiker and Grant 2011). The results were consistent with those of previous studies worldwide (Hoogland et al 2020;Shiferaw et al 2020;Villadsen et al 2020). These identified non-modifiable factors can be used to determine which individuals are at risk of poor e-health literacy, and to indentify the vulnerable population that medical staff need to target (Cheng et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…At the social/community level, language barriers and cultural barriers influenced the e-health literacy of Chinese immigrants. Our findings were consistent with the lower e-health literacy levels found among adult immigrants in Denmark (Villadsen et al 2020) and America (Chesser et al 2014). Language barriers and cultural barriers aggravate the difficulty of the immigrants in accessing and using e-health resources, especially the older adults, because they have to face multiple challenges of language, culture, and technology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Item response theory analysis confirmed that there were no disordered thresholds, and differential item functioning (DIF) testing established evidence of measurement invariance for age and sex [ 21 ]. The eHLQ has since been used to investigate the eHealth literacy of nursing students and pregnant migrant women in Denmark [ 22 , 23 ], as well as to examine the association of eHealth literacy and digital health service use in both Denmark and Australia [ 24 , 25 ]. The tool has also been used in Australia to understand the eHealth literacy needs of community members, leading to the generation of numerous concrete solutions to address the identified needs [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate understanding of health information provided face-to-face by a health worker depends on several factors, such as health literacy, language proficiency, and the cultural competence and communication skills of both the patient and healthcare worker [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. In addition, migrant background, educational level, and occupational and economic status can also influence the understanding of the health information of a patient [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%