1977
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1977.40.3c.1099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ego Identity: Effects of Ethnocentrism, Ethnic Identification, and Cognitive Complexity in Israeli, Oriental, and Western Ethnic Groups

Abstract: This study investigated the relationship of ego identity to ethnocentrism, ethnic identification, and cognitive complexity. A sample of 378 Israeli high school students were administered: (a) the Adolescent Ego Identity Scale, (b) Ethnocentrism and Ethnic Group Identification Scale, and (c) Role Repertory Test. In a four-way analysis of variance, low as compared to high ethnocentric persons were higher in ego identity. Persons with high as compared to low ethnic identification were higher in ego identity. An i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotheram and Phinney (1987) defined ethnic identiv as "one's sense of belonging to an ethnic group and the part of one's thinking, perception, feeling, and behavior that is due to ethnic group membership" (p. 13). The specific aspects that researchers emphasize for ethnic identity differ widely, as researchers have considered the key aspects to include self-identification of group membership (Tzuriel & Klein, 1977), cultural value (Ting-Toomey, 198 l), attitudes and behavior (DeLucia & Balkin, 1988), and aspects such as subjective affiliation, language use and knowledge, and preferences (Rogler, Cooney, & Ortiz, 1984). Phinney (1992) identified and measured ethnic identity as a generalized phenomenon across diverse ethnic groups, embracing self-identification, ethnic behaviors and practices, affirmation and belonging, and ethnic identity achievement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotheram and Phinney (1987) defined ethnic identiv as "one's sense of belonging to an ethnic group and the part of one's thinking, perception, feeling, and behavior that is due to ethnic group membership" (p. 13). The specific aspects that researchers emphasize for ethnic identity differ widely, as researchers have considered the key aspects to include self-identification of group membership (Tzuriel & Klein, 1977), cultural value (Ting-Toomey, 198 l), attitudes and behavior (DeLucia & Balkin, 1988), and aspects such as subjective affiliation, language use and knowledge, and preferences (Rogler, Cooney, & Ortiz, 1984). Phinney (1992) identified and measured ethnic identity as a generalized phenomenon across diverse ethnic groups, embracing self-identification, ethnic behaviors and practices, affirmation and belonging, and ethnic identity achievement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dimensions (with the exception of the commitment and purposefulness dimension) were found to differentiate significantly between adolescents from a clinical group that either attempted suicide or threatened to attempt it, on the one hand, and a group of normative adolescents, on the other (Tzuriel and Bar Yoseph 1986). In addition, dimensions of ego identity and general ego identity were found to be related to social gender roles (Tzuriel 1984), cognitive complexity (Fisherman 2001), and nationality identification and ethnocentrism (Tzuriel and Klein 1977). The average of the responses provides a measurement for every dimension of the ego identity, as well as for the general ego identity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These dimensions (with the exception of the commitment and purposefulness dimension) were found to differentiate significantly between adolescents from a clinical group that either attempted suicide or threatened to attempt it, on the one hand, and a group of normative adolescents, on the other (Tzuriel & Bar-Joseph 1986). In addition, dimensions of ego identity and general ego identity were found to be related to social gender roles (Tzuriel 1984), cognitive complexity (Fisherman 2001), and nationality identification and ethnocentrism (Tzuriel and Klein 1977). The average of the responses provides a measurement for every dimension of the ego identity, as well as for the general ego identity.…”
Section: The Adolescents Ego Identity Scale (Aeis) (Tzuriel 1974; 198mentioning
confidence: 97%