1959
DOI: 10.1037/h0045655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ego disjunction and psychopathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trehub (12 ) found no significant differences among the means on ego-disjunction within his subgroups containing character disorders, neurotics, and adolescents. For the present group classified as sociopathic personalities however, there was a significant difference between the low and high anxiety subgroups on measures of ego-disjunction and ego-strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Trehub (12 ) found no significant differences among the means on ego-disjunction within his subgroups containing character disorders, neurotics, and adolescents. For the present group classified as sociopathic personalities however, there was a significant difference between the low and high anxiety subgroups on measures of ego-disjunction and ego-strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…ED is defined as the occurrence in the individual of two or more relatively strong needs with mutually incompatible objectives, and represents a type of intrapsychic conflict which disrupts ego functions. It is scored by summing the degree of disjunction for each indicator pair (Trehub, 1959). ED has been related to degree of psychopathology (Trehub, 1959).…”
Section: Ego Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is scored by summing the degree of disjunction for each indicator pair (Trehub, 1959). ED has been related to degree of psychopathology (Trehub, 1959).…”
Section: Ego Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scaling procedure which utilized the concept of incompatible pairs of needs (Heilizer, 1961b) demonstrated that pairs of needs are distributed continuously, rather than dichotomously, on a dimension of incompatibility. Furthermore, the four pairs of needs selected by Trehub (1959) were not at the extreme of the continuum of incompatible pairs of needs. It therefore becomes important to determine the implications that a continuum of incompatibility has for Trehub's theory.…”
Section: Incompatible Pairs Of Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this article is to extend and generalize Trehub's (1959) theory of need conflict (called ego disjunction) and to submit the revised theory to test. Trehub considers that intensity of conflict is solely a function of the sum of two incompatible needs, where incompatibility refers to the judgment that the behavior which secures satisfaction of one need excludes the occurrence of the behavior which secures satisfaction of the other need.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%