2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EGFR mutation detection in ctDNA from NSCLC patient plasma: A cross-platform comparison of leading technologies to support the clinical development of AZD9291

Abstract: The cobas(®) EGFR Mutation Test and BEAMing dPCR demonstrate a high sensitivity for T790M mutation detection. Genomic heterogeneity of T790M-mediated resistance may explain the reduced specificity observed with plasma-based detection of T790M mutations versus tissue. These data support the use of both platforms in the AZD9291 clinical development program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
354
6
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 449 publications
(396 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
24
354
6
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, 18/164 patients with plasma T790M-positive genotyping were T790M-negative on tissue analysis, showing favorable clinical outcomes similar to those of patients with T790M-positive tumor tissue (Oxnard et al, 2016). These data, consistently with those observed in other studies evaluating plasma genotyping approach at the time of PD (Takahama et al, 2016;Thress et al, 2015), demonstrated a lower specificity of plasma-based detection of T790M at PD compared to EGFR-activating mutations detection at baseline, likely due to the higher heterogeneity of TKI-resistant tumors. As single tissue biopsy is just a snapshot of the tumor not reflecting its spatial heterogeneity, ctDNA could be more representative of the overall tumor mutation status, allowing to identify different targetable alterations driving tumor resistance.…”
Section: Potential Application At Progressionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Interestingly, 18/164 patients with plasma T790M-positive genotyping were T790M-negative on tissue analysis, showing favorable clinical outcomes similar to those of patients with T790M-positive tumor tissue (Oxnard et al, 2016). These data, consistently with those observed in other studies evaluating plasma genotyping approach at the time of PD (Takahama et al, 2016;Thress et al, 2015), demonstrated a lower specificity of plasma-based detection of T790M at PD compared to EGFR-activating mutations detection at baseline, likely due to the higher heterogeneity of TKI-resistant tumors. As single tissue biopsy is just a snapshot of the tumor not reflecting its spatial heterogeneity, ctDNA could be more representative of the overall tumor mutation status, allowing to identify different targetable alterations driving tumor resistance.…”
Section: Potential Application At Progressionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Using BEAMing digital PCR analysis, Oxnard et al found that the sensitivity of plasma genotyping for detection T790M was 70% (17), comparable that reported previously (21). T790M mutation was detected in 18 of 58 (31%) patients with T790M negative tumor.…”
Section: Commentarysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Numerous studies have yielded evidence that ctDNA can be used to complement tumor DNA testing to detect these genetic alterations. Thress et al demonstrated the efficacy of two different platforms to detect T790M in blood, with a sensitivity of 73% and 81% and specificity of 67% and 58% (40). In one study, similar objective response rates (ORR) were seen in patients treated with rociletinib, regardless of whether T790M was detected in tumor or plasma (21).…”
Section: Role Of Ctdna In the Resistance Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%