Over the past 20 years we have seen a phenomenal increase in our understanding ofthe diversity and the molecular mechanism of action of signal transduction systems. Now we are faced with a cell being provided with a myriad of cell surface receptors, each connected to particular signal transduction systems. The very complexity of such systems, together with the need of the cell to monitor and respond to a variety of external stimuli, poses the question as to what overall controls are placed upon these various transduction mechanisms and how they might relate to each other. At one extreme, we can envisage that pathways might be isolated completely from each other and thus function in an an apparent 'vacuum'. On the other hand, we can envisage 'cross-talk' between the various pathways linking each into an adaptable network array. Such a network, linking distinct signalling systems, would offer the cell a sophisticated ability to sense multiple environmental signals impinging upon it, thus providing a means of adapting or regulating its response to a particular range of effectors. In this way the cell might respond to the relative concentrations of various signals, taking into account the particular point in time when it first experienced a specific signal, together with the absolute length of time it was exposed to it. Such parameters having markedly different effects on cellular behaviour. Thus one might envisage that both the 'quantity' and the 'quality' of information flowing through any particular signal transduction system might be altered by the functioning of other transduction systems which were linked to form such an interactive network. A cell controlled in such a fashion could be regarded as being capable of 'learning', Correspondence to