2005
DOI: 10.3354/meps293131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Egestion of non-pellet-bound fecal material from the copepod Acartia tonsa: implication for vertical flux and degradation

Abstract: Only a minor fraction of copepod defecation appears to leave the upper water column as fast-sinking fecal pellets in coastal waters. This study suggests that most egested matter from copepods is retained in the water column because (1) > 50% of fecal matter is released as small, slowsinking particles that are not surrounded by a peritrophic membrane and (2) small fecal pellets sink slowly and are degraded rapidly. The production, appearance and fate of fecal material from the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa (fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the size of fecal pellets increases as the concentration of the food increases, such that they reach a maximum size when the concentration of food is above the saturation level (Dagg and Walser, 1986;Butler and Dam, 1994). Our results confirmed these previous relationship curve generalized by Olesen et al (2005). 587 Figure 5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the size of fecal pellets increases as the concentration of the food increases, such that they reach a maximum size when the concentration of food is above the saturation level (Dagg and Walser, 1986;Butler and Dam, 1994). Our results confirmed these previous relationship curve generalized by Olesen et al (2005). 587 Figure 5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Fecal pellets produced from a diet of the diatom species presented the slowest rate of degradation when compared with those produced from diets of the nanoflagellate or dinoflagellate species. Similarly, Olesen et al (2005) compared the degradation rate of fecal pellets produced on a diet of the diatom, Skeletonema costatum, or the nanoflagellate, Rhodomonas salina, and reported a similar trend but higher degradation rates than Hansen et al (1996). The relationship between the surface : volume ratio and the degradation rate of fecal pellets was used to explain the variation in the degradation rate of pellets produced with different diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is therefore reasonable to assume that the DOM released into the thin layers in our experiment was not solely due to sloppy feeding but a result of diffusion of DOC through the peritrophic membrane of fecal material (Jumars et al 1989) as well as possible excretion and accumulation of some primary amines (Miller & Glibert 1998). It may also derive from small particulate material that is egested by copepods but not bound by a peritrophic membrane (Olesen et al 2005), and through coprohexy (Lampitt et al 1990). The notion of high fecal pellet production at the site of feeding is supported by experimental studies that show fecal production rate is highly synchronous with grazing activity (measured by gut fluorescence, Bautista et al 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hence a considerable fraction is voided as fecal pellets (fp) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (Smetacek 1980, Jumars et al 1989, Turner 2002, Møller et al 2003, Olesen et al 2005. Copepod fp have a high C:N ratio compared to the original food (Morales 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%