2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2020)163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFT anomalous dimensions from the S-matrix

Abstract: We use the on-shell S-matrix and form factors to compute anomalous dimensions of higher dimension operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory. We find that in many instances, these computations are made simple by using the on-shell method. We first compute contributions to anomalous dimensions of operators at dimension-six that arise at one-loop. Then we calculate two-loop anomalous dimensions for which the corresponding one-loop contribution is absent, using this powerful method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the top quark and the Higgs and electroweak bosons are absent from the plasma for T < T EW , the Higgs-mediated single production cannot occur, and we are again back to the gravity-mediate scenario of the previous section. 13 To summarize, we find that for S = 2 DM it is possible to realize the scenario of Higgs-mediated freeze-in production in a limited region of the parameter space:…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the top quark and the Higgs and electroweak bosons are absent from the plasma for T < T EW , the Higgs-mediated single production cannot occur, and we are again back to the gravity-mediate scenario of the previous section. 13 To summarize, we find that for S = 2 DM it is possible to realize the scenario of Higgs-mediated freeze-in production in a limited region of the parameter space:…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…On-shell amplitude methods, initially developed in the context of massless QCD [1], are finding applications in more and more areas of particle physics. Recently these methods have shed some new light on dynamics of black holes [2][3][4][5], construction of bases of effective field theories (EFTs) [6][7][8][9][10], calculation of renormalization group running [11][12][13][14], to name just a few examples. An important ingredient in this program was the development of a convenient spinor formalism to handle massive particles [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85]) and consider their renormalization using both conventional and on-shell formalism (see e.g. [86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94]). While the state-of-the-art computation is mostly at one-loop order, it would be worth extending the method developed in this paper to general two-loop renormalization in SMEFT (see also [95]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting operators will then be evolved to the scale appropriate for the measurement using renormalization group equations (RGE) [45][46][47][48][49][50]. Recently, a deeper connection has been established between the helicity amplitude structures of SMEFT and the RGEs of the operator coefficients [38,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. In short, an operator is only renormalized by another if the latter contributes at one…”
Section: Robustness Of the Sum Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%