2009
DOI: 10.2172/963841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFRT M-12 Issue Resolution: Comparison of Filter Performance at PEP and CUF Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, shorter, single tubes are used in bench-scale processes. Previous work with simulants in the Pretreatment Engineering Platform has demonstrated that the performance for full-length bundles is approximately the same as for single 2-foot filter elements when represented as a filter flux (permeate rate/surface area) (Daniel et al 2010).…”
Section: Crossflow Filtration Scaling Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, shorter, single tubes are used in bench-scale processes. Previous work with simulants in the Pretreatment Engineering Platform has demonstrated that the performance for full-length bundles is approximately the same as for single 2-foot filter elements when represented as a filter flux (permeate rate/surface area) (Daniel et al 2010).…”
Section: Crossflow Filtration Scaling Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Table 2, the 6-inch-long filter element more closely matches the full-scale filter feed tank-volume-to-filter-area ratio (66 vs. 50 cm 3 /cm 2 ), and given the low amount of solids expected in the AP-105 feed (first feed slated to be tested), the 6-inch filter is recommended. However, it is worth noting that the 2-foot-long filter elements have been demonstrated to provide sufficient length to generally avoid measurable entrance effects (Daniel et al 2010). This demonstration has not been performed for the 6-inch filter.…”
Section: Crossflow Filtration Scaling Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar simulant has been used in prior filtration testing (over a shorter duration) at the bench and pilot scale Daniel et al, 2009Daniel et al, , 2010. For more detailed information on the simulant composition and makeup refer to Scheele et al (2009), where the material used in these tests was from Batch 2 (see Tables 3.10, 3.12, and 3.13).…”
Section: Filtration Simulantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crossflow filtration of HLW simulants has, thus far, not exhibited a steady-state behavior (on the 12 h time scale) and showed decline in performance, e.g. measured permeate flux, after days of operation in a pilot scale facility (Daniel et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation